TACE combined with apatinib for the treatment of BCLC stage C of hepatocellular carcinoma: A restrospective controlled study.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 445-445
Author(s):  
Xuefeng Kan ◽  
Bin Xiong ◽  
Yong Wang ◽  
Bin Liang ◽  
Guofeng Zhou ◽  
...  

445 Background: To access the safety and effcacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib (TACE-apatinib) for the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The medical records of 290 consecutive patients with BCLC stage C of HCC who underwent TACE-apatinib or TACE-alone from June 2015 to June 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. a-Fetoprotein (AFP) response at 4 weeks after treatment in the two groups were evaluated. Tumor response in the two groups were assessed according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (m-RECIST) criteria. The time to tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the two groups were evaluated respectively. Results: One hundred and ninety patients were included in the analysis; 95 patients underwent TACE-apatinib and 95 underwent TACE-alone. The baseline characteristics of patients between the two groups were comparable. The disease control rate (DCR) of tumor and AFP response in TACE-apatinib group was significantly greater than that of TACE-alone group ( P < 0.001). The median TTP was 14.0 months in the TACE-apatinib group and 3.0 months in the TACE-alone group, and the median OS was 17 months in the TACE-apatinib group and 6.0 months in the TACE-alone group. Apatinib-related adverse events of grade 3 occurred in 14 patients in TACE-apatinib group, and there was no occurrence of grade 4 adverse event. Conclusions: The adverse effects of apatinib were acceptable, and TACE-apatinib improved the outcomes for patients with BCLC stage C of HCC in comparison to TACE-alone.

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 472 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Salman ◽  
E. Simoneau ◽  
M. Hassanain ◽  
P. Chaudhury ◽  
L.M. Boucher ◽  
...  

Background and Aims In this pilot study, we assessed the safety and tolerability of combining sorafenib with 90Y radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc).Methods The study, conducted prospectively during 2009–2012, included eligible patients with unresectable hcc and a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks. Each patient received sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) for 6–8 weeks before 90Y treatment. Safety and tolerability were assessed.Results Of the 40 patients enrolled, 29 completed treatment (combined therapy). In the initial cohort, the most common cause of hcc was hepatitis C (32.5%), and most patients were staged Child A (82.5%). The 29 patients who completed the study had similar  baseline characteristics. Grades 1 and 2 toxicities accounted for 77.8% of all adverse events reported. The most common toxicities reported were fatigue (19.0%), alteration in liver function (7.9%), and diarrhea (6.3%). There were 12 grade 3 and 2 grade 4 toxicity events reported. One patient died of liver failure within 30 days after treatment. During the study, the sorafenib dose was reduced in 6 patients (20.7%), and sorafenib had to be interrupted in 4 patients (13.8%) and discontinued in 4 patients (13.8%). The disease control rate was 72.4% per the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and tumour necrosis was observed in 82.8% of patients. Overall survival in patients undergoing combined therapy was 12.4 months.Conclusions Preliminary results demonstrate the safety and tolerability of combining 90Y radioembolization and sorafenib for advanced hcc. A larger prospective study is needed to determine the extent of the survival benefit.


2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Giuseppe Lo Russo ◽  
Matteo Salgarello ◽  
Giulia Corrao ◽  
Raffaella Casolino ◽  
...  

The objective response is an important endpoint to evaluate clinical activity of new anticancer drugs. Standardized criteria for evaluating response are needed for comparing results of different trials and represent the basis for advances in cancer therapy. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 are the most used in clinical practice and in clinical trials; however, they are not able to capture atypical responses seen with immunotherapy drugs. We describe the evolution of response criteria with a special focus on the immune-related criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document