Validation of Global Land-Cover Products by the Committee on Earth Observing Satellites

2004 ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Morisette ◽  
Jeffrey Privette ◽  
Alan Strahler ◽  
Philippe Mayaux ◽  
Christopher Justice
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Global Land Cover ◽  
Global Land

scholarly journals Integrating Land-Cover Products Based on Ontologies and Local Accuracy

Information ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Guangshuai Jin ◽  
Dejun Gao
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Semantic Similarity ◽  
Mixed Forest ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Semantic Mapping ◽  
Global Land Cover ◽  
Resolution Observation ◽  
Local Accuracy ◽  
Global Land ◽  
Broad Leaf

Freely available satellite imagery improves the research and production of land-cover products at the global scale or over large areas. The integration of land-cover products is a process of combining the advantages or characteristics of several products to generate new products and meet the demand for special needs. This study presents an ontology-based semantic mapping approach for integration land-cover products using hybrid ontology with EAGLE (EIONET Action Group on Land monitoring in Europe) matrix elements as the shared vocabulary, linking and comparing concepts from multiple local ontologies. Ontology mapping based on term, attribute and instance is combined to obtain the semantic similarity between heterogeneous land-cover products and realise the integration on a schema level. Moreover, through the collection and interpretation of ground verification points, the local accuracy of the source product is evaluated using the index Kriging method. Two integration models are developed that combine semantic similarity and local accuracy. Taking NLCD (National Land Cover Database) and FROM-GLC-Seg (Finer Resolution Observation and Monitoring-Global Land Cover-Segmentation) as source products and the second-level class refinement of GlobeLand30 land-cover product as an example, the forest class is subdivided into broad-leaf, coniferous and mixed forest. Results show that the highest accuracies of the second class are 82.6%, 72.0% and 60.0%, respectively, for broad-leaf, coniferous and mixed forest.

scholarly journals Production of global daily seamless data cubes and quantification of global land cover change from 1985 to 2020 - iMap World 1.0

2021 ◽  
Vol 258 ◽  
pp. 112364
Author(s):  
Han Liu ◽  
Peng Gong ◽  
Jie Wang ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
Grant Ning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Land Cover Change ◽  
Data Cubes ◽  
Global Land Cover ◽  
Global Land

A remote sensing based vegetation classification logic for global land cover analysis

1995 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven W. Running ◽  
Thomas R. Loveland ◽  
Lars L. Pierce ◽  
R.R. Nemani ◽  
E.R. Hunt
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Vegetation Classification ◽  
Global Land Cover ◽  
Global Land

scholarly journals Utilizing the Global Land Cover 2000 reference dataset for a comparative accuracy assessment of 1 km global land cover maps

2015 ◽  
Vol XL-7/W3 ◽  
pp. 503-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Schultz ◽  
N. E. Tsendbazazr ◽  
M. Herold ◽  
M. Jung ◽  
P. Mayaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Cover ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Accuracy Assessment ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Reference Dataset ◽  
Heterogeneous Landscape ◽  
Global Land Cover ◽  
Global Land ◽  
Land Cover Maps

Many investigators use global land cover (GLC) maps for different purposes, such as an input for global climate models. The current GLC maps used for such purposes are based on different remote sensing data, methodologies and legends. Consequently, comparison of GLC maps is difficult and information about their relative utility is limited. The objective of this study is to analyse and compare the thematic accuracies of GLC maps (i.e., IGBP-DISCover, UMD, MODIS, GLC2000 and SYNMAP) at 1 km resolutions by (a) re-analysing the GLC2000 reference dataset, (b) applying a generalized GLC legend and (c) comparing their thematic accuracies at different homogeneity levels. The accuracy assessment was based on the GLC2000 reference dataset with 1253 samples that were visually interpreted. The legends of the GLC maps and the reference datasets were harmonized into 11 general land cover classes. There results show that the map accuracy estimates vary up to 10-16% depending on the homogeneity of the reference point (HRP) for all the GLC maps. An increase of the HRP resulted in higher overall accuracies but reduced accuracy confidence for the GLC maps due to less number of accountable samples. The overall accuracy of the SYNMAP was the highest at any HRP level followed by the GLC2000. The overall accuracies of the maps also varied by up to 10% depending on the definition of agreement between the reference and map categories in heterogeneous landscape. A careful consideration of heterogeneous landscape is therefore recommended for future accuracy assessments of land cover maps.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document