The GAP-tree, an approach to ‘on-the-fly’ map generalization of an area partitioning

2020 ◽  
pp. 120-132
Author(s):  
Peter van Oosterom
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 649
Author(s):  
Changbin WU ◽  
Zaihong SUN ◽  
Weifeng QIAO ◽  
Guonian LV
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  

1964 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. E. Grabau ◽  
E. E. Addor
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 539-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Wei ◽  
Qingsheng Guo ◽  
Lin Wang ◽  
Fen Yan

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Bimonte ◽  
Michela Bertolotto ◽  
Jérôme Gensel ◽  
Omar Boussaid

Map generalization can be used as a central component of Spatial Decision Support Systems to provide a simplified and more readable cartographic visualization of geographic information. Indeed, it supports the user mental process for discovering important and unknown geospatial relations, trends and patterns. Spatial OLAP (SOLAP) integrates spatial data into OLAP and data warehouse systems. SOLAP models and tools are based on the concepts of spatial dimensions and measures that represent the axes and the subjects of the spatio-multidimensional analysis. Although powerful under some respect, current SOLAP models cannot support map generalization capabilities. This paper provides the first effort to integrate Map Generalization and OLAP. Firstly the authors define all modeling and querying requirements to do this integration, and then present a SOLAP model and algebra that support map generalization concepts. The approach extends SOLAP spatial hierarchies introducing multi-association relationships, supports imprecise measures, and it takes into account spatial dimensions constraints generated by multiple map generalization hierarchies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Timofey E. Samsonov

Combining misaligned spatial data from different sources complicates spatial analysis and creation of maps. Conflation is a process that solves the misalignment problem through spatial adjustment or attribute transfer between similar features in two datasets. Even though a combination of digital elevation model (DEM) and vector hydrographic lines is a common practice in spatial analysis and mapping, no method for automated conflation between these spatial data types has been developed so far. The problem of DEM and hydrography misalignment arises not only in map compilation, but also during the production of generalized datasets. There is a lack of automated solutions which can ensure that the drainage network represented in the surface of generalized DEM is spatially adjusted with independently generalized vector hydrography. We propose a new method that performs the conflation of DEM with linear hydrographic data and is embeddable into DEM generalization process. Given a set of reference hydrographic lines, our method automatically recognizes the most similar paths on DEM surface called counterpart streams. The elevation data extracted from DEM is then rubbersheeted locally using the links between counterpart streams and reference lines, and the conflated DEM is reconstructed from the rubbersheeted elevation data. The algorithm developed for extraction of counterpart streams ensures that the resulting set of lines comprises the network similar to the network of ordered reference lines. We also show how our approach can be seamlessly integrated into a TIN-based structural DEM generalization process with spatial adjustment to pre-generalized hydrographic lines as additional requirement. The combination of the GEBCO_2019 DEM and the Natural Earth 10M vector dataset is used to illustrate the effectiveness of DEM conflation both in map compilation and map generalization workflows. Resulting maps are geographically correct and are aesthetically more pleasing in comparison to a straightforward combination of misaligned DEM and hydrographic lines without conflation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document