Pi, a Transcendental Number

2020 ◽  
pp. 152-160
Author(s):  
Malcolm E Lines
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1401-1409
Author(s):  
E. Muñoz Garcia ◽  
◽  
R. Pérez-Marco ◽  

2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAROSLAV HANČL ◽  
JAN ŠTĚPNIČKA

AbstractThe paper deals with a criterion for the sum of a special series to be a transcendental number. The result does not make use of divisibility properties or any kind of equation and depends only on the random oscillation of convergence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-489
Author(s):  
XIANG GAO ◽  
SHENGYOU WEN

It is known that the Fourier–Stieltjes coefficients of a nonatomic coin-tossing measure may not vanish at infinity. However, we show that they could vanish at infinity along some integer subsequences, including the sequence ${\{b^{n}\}}_{n\geq 1}$ where $b$ is multiplicatively independent of 2 and the sequence given by the multiplicative semigroup generated by 3 and 5. The proof is based on elementary combinatorics and lower-bound estimates for linear forms in logarithms from transcendental number theory.


1992 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 530-537
Author(s):  
Nigel Walker

In 1897 the Indiana House of Representatives was persuaded by a mathematician (of sorts) to entertain a bill “introducing a new mathematical truth”. The new truth was a method, or more precisely methods, for computing the value of π. Since π is a transcendental number the methods could at best have achieved an approximation. In fact they yielded several inaccurate values, one as wild as 4. The legislators were doubtful enough to refer the bill to a committee (the Committee on Canals) and, when this reported favourably, to the Committee on Temperance. Eventually they had the sense to defer it sine die.


2012 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. 1099-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
NAOMI TANABE

This paper is to show a non-vanishing property of the derivative of certain L-functions. For certain primitive holomorphic Hilbert modular forms, if the central critical value of the standard L-function does not vanish, then neither does its derivative. This is a generalization of a result by Gun, Murty and Rath in the case of elliptic modular forms. Some applications in transcendental number theory deduced from this result are discussed as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document