Triamcinolone Acetonide

The study use intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection proceduce for chalazion treatment.1. Objectives: To evaluate results of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for chalazion treatment. 2. Method: This noncomparative prospective interventional trial included 72 chalazions of 61 patients. 3. Results: 61 patients (72 chalazions) with 19 males (31.1%) và 42 females (68.9%), the mean age was 24 ± 9,78 years. 31.1% patients was the first time chalazion and 68.9% patients was more than one times chalazion including 78.6% patients was recurrent at the first position and 21.4% patients occur at new position. 72 chalazions with 16 (22.2%) chalazions was treated before and 56 (77.8%) chalazions wasn’t done that. 72 chalazions with 49 chalazions (68.1%) are local in upper eyelid and 23 chalazions (31.9%) are local in lower eyelid. The mean of chalazion diameter is 6.99 ± 3.03mm. Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide is injected to treat 72 chalazions with 16 (22.2%) chalazions are injected through the route of skin and 56 (77.8%) chalazions are injected through the route of conjunctiva. After 2 weeks follow-up, the success rate was 93.1% and 6.9% failed. 4. Conclusion: intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for chalazion treatment is really effective. Key words: chalazion, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Prophylactic selective laser trabeculoplasty in the prevention of intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.715297832.790752841 ◽

2012 ◽

Author(s):

James Tan

Keyword(s):

Intraocular Pressure ◽

Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty ◽

Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽

Pressure Elevation ◽

Laser Trabeculoplasty ◽

Intraocular Pressure Elevation ◽

Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection

Download Full-text

Current Therapy of Diabetic Macular Edema Bevacizumab, Triamcinolone Acetonide, and Laser Photocoagulation

Ophthalmologica Indonesiana ◽

10.35749/journal.v45i1.172 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 45 (1) ◽

pp. 13

Author(s):

Gladys Kusumowidagdo ◽

Randy Sarayar ◽

Kartika Rahayu ◽

Gitalisa Andayani

Keyword(s):

Macular Edema ◽

Triamcinolone Acetonide ◽

Diabetic Macular Edema ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Laser Photocoagulation ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Intravitreal Bevacizumab ◽

Current Therapy ◽

Intravitreal Triamcinolone ◽

Mesh Terms

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the main cause of visual impairment in diabetic retinopathy (DR). Current gold standard therapy of DME is macular laser photocoagulation (MPC). Growing evidences have shown benefits of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents (i.e bevacizumab) and intravitreal corticosteroids (i.e triamcinolone acetonide). Aim: To compare the visual acuity (VA) improvement of patients with DME, treated with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), a combination of IVB and intravitreal triamcinolone (IVB/IVT), and MPC. Method: A comprehensive PubMed® and Cochrane® databases search was conducted on May 4th, 2017 using appropriate keywords (diabetic macular edema, bevacizumab, triamcinolone, and laser photocoagulation using their MeSH terms). Studies were filtered using inclusion criterions (clinical trials, RCT, meta-analysis, systematic review, English, humans, and publication within 10 years) Results: Three studies (2 systematic reviews and 1 RCT) were found suitable. From these results, all studies showed favoring effects of IVB when compared to IVB/IVT combination and MPC in short term period (up to 6 months). However, there was no significant improvement of VA beyond this period in all groups. Conclusion: IVB appears to be superior to IVB/IVT and MPC in improving VA during 6 months follow- up period. Future systematic reviews and meta-analysis are required on the effect of IVB and MPC combination in cases of DME.

Download Full-text