Data flow issues and BPMN mapping to Petri Net: Road map

Keyword(s):  
IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 43265-43276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Liu ◽  
Qingtian Zeng ◽  
Hua Duan ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Jie Tan ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 1870-1891 ◽  
Author(s):  
S LOMOV ◽  
D IVANOV ◽  
I VERPOEST ◽  
M ZAKO ◽  
T KURASHIKI ◽  
...  

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 966
Author(s):  
Dongming Xiang ◽  
Fang Zhao ◽  
Yaping Liu

Petri nets are widely used to model concurrent software systems. Currently, there are many different kinds of Petri net tools that can analyze system properties such as deadlocks, reachability and liveness. However, most tools are not suitable to analyze data-flow errors of concurrent systems because they do not formalize data information and lack efficient computing methods for analyzing data-flows. Especially when a concurrent system has so many concurrent data operations, these Petri net tools easily suffer from the state–space explosion problem and pseudo-states. To alleviate these problems, we develop a new model checker DICER 2.0. By using this tool, we can model the control-flows and data-flows of concurrent software systems. Moreover, the errors of data inconsistency can be detected based on the unfolding techniques, and some model-checking can be done via the guard-driven reachability graph (GRG). Furthermore, some case studies and experiments are done to show the effectiveness and advantage of our tool.


2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
KERRI WACHTER
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Rauthmann

Abstract. There is as yet no consensually agreed-upon situational taxonomy. The current work addresses this issue and reviews extant taxonomic approaches by highlighting a “road map” of six research stations that lead to the observed diversity in taxonomies: (1) theoretical and conceptual guidelines, (2) the “type” of situational information studied, (3) the general taxonomic approach taken, (4) the generation of situation pools, (5) the assessment and rating of situational information, and (6) the statistical analyses of situation data. Current situational taxonomies are difficult to integrate because they follow different paths along these six stations. Some suggestions are given on how to spur integrated taxonomies toward a unified psychology of situations that speaks a common language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document