scholarly journals Transmission of Monetary Policy with Heterogeneity in Household Portfolios

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Ralph Luetticke
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
New Keynesian ◽  
Liquidity Premium ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Marginal Value ◽  
Household Portfolios ◽  
Household Portfolio ◽  
Business Cycle Model ◽  
Liquidity Premia ◽  
Transmission Of Monetary Policy

This paper assesses the importance of heterogeneity in household portfolios for the transmission of monetary policy in a New Keynesian business cycle model with uninsurable income risk and assets with different liquidity. In this environment, monetary transmission works through investment, but redistribution lowers the elasticity of investment via two channels: (i) heterogeneity in marginal propensities to invest, and (ii) time variation in the liquidity premium. Monetary contractions redistribute to wealthy households who have high propensities to invest and a low marginal value of liquidity, thereby stabilizing investment. I provide empirical evidence for countercyclical liquidity premia and heterogeneity in household portfolio responses. (JEL E12, E32, E52, G11, G51)

Liquidity, Risk Premia, and the Financial Transmission of Monetary Policy

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 309-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itamar Drechsler ◽  
Alexi Savov ◽  
Philipp Schnabl
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Risk Sharing ◽  
Financial System ◽  
Risk Premia ◽  
New Keynesian ◽  
Liquidity Premium ◽  
Impact Risk ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Transmission Of Monetary Policy

In recent years, there has been a resurgence of research on the transmission of monetary policy through the financial system, fueled in part by empirical findings showing that monetary policy affects asset prices and the financial system in ways not explained by the New Keynesian paradigm. In particular, monetary policy appears to impact risk premia in stock and bond prices and to effectively control the liquidity premium in the economy (the cost of holding liquid assets). We review these findings and recent theories proposed to explain them, and we outline a conceptual framework that unifies them. The framework revolves around the central role of liquidity in risk sharing and explains how monetary policy governs its production and use within the financial sector.

Services Deepening and the Transmission of Monetary Policy

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1261-1293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Galesi ◽  
Omar Rachedi
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
New Keynesian ◽  
Monetary Policy Shocks ◽  
Marginal Costs ◽  
Cost Channel ◽  
Keynesian Model ◽  
Output Matrix ◽  
Inflation Rates ◽  
Policy Shocks ◽  
Transmission Of Monetary Policy

Abstract The structural transformation from manufacturing to services comes with a process of services deepening: the services share of intermediate inputs rises over time. Moreover, inflation reacts less to monetary policy shocks in countries that are more intensive in services intermediates. We rationalize these facts using a two-sector New Keynesian model where trends in sectoral productivities generate endogenous variations in the Input–Output matrix. Services deepening reduces the contemporaneous response of inflation to monetary policy shocks through a marginal cost channel. Since services prices are stickier than manufacturing prices, the rise of services intermediates raises the sluggishness of sectoral marginal costs and inflation rates.

scholarly journals The Deposits Channel of Monetary Policy*

2017 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1819-1876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itamar Drechsler ◽  
Alexi Savov ◽  
Philipp Schnabl
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Market Power ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Strong Relationship ◽  
Bank Lending ◽  
Liquidity Premium ◽  
Balance Sheets ◽  
Fed Funds Rate ◽  
Bank Balance Sheets ◽  
Transmission Of Monetary Policy

Abstract We present a new channel for the transmission of monetary policy, the deposits channel. We show that when the Fed funds rate rises, banks widen the spreads they charge on deposits, and deposits flow out of the banking system. We present a model where this is due to market power in deposit markets. Consistent with the market power mechanism, deposit spreads increase more and deposits flow out more in concentrated markets. This is true even when we control for lending opportunities by only comparing different branches of the same bank. Since deposits are the main source of liquid assets for households, the deposits channel can explain the observed strong relationship between the liquidity premium and the Fed funds rate. Since deposits are also a uniquely stable funding source for banks, the deposits channel impacts bank lending. When the Fed funds rate rises, banks that raise deposits in concentrated markets contract their lending by more than other banks. Our estimates imply that the deposits channel can account for the entire transmission of monetary policy through bank balance sheets.

scholarly journals Understanding HANK: Insights From a PRANK

Econometrica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1113-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushant Acharya ◽  
Keshav Dogra
Keyword(s):  
Monetary Policy ◽  
Fiscal Policy ◽  
Incomplete Markets ◽  
New Keynesian ◽  
New Keynesian Model ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Heterogeneous Agent ◽  
Liquidity Trap ◽  
Forward Guidance ◽  
Keynesian Model

Using an analytically tractable heterogeneous agent New Keynesian model, we show that whether incomplete markets resolve New Keynesian “paradoxes” depends on the cyclicality of income risk. Incomplete markets reduce the effectiveness of forward guidance and multipliers in a liquidity trap only with procyclical risk. Countercyclical risk amplifies these “puzzles.” Procyclical risk permits determinacy under a peg; countercyclical risk may generate indeterminacy even under the Taylor principle. By affecting the cyclicality of risk, even “passive” fiscal policy influences the effects of monetary policy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document