scholarly journals Mask ventilation

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1683
Author(s):  
Paul Baker

Effective mask ventilation is an essential skill for any practitioner engaged in airway management. Recent methods to objectively describe mask ventilation using waveform capnography help practitioners to monitor and communicate the effectiveness of mask ventilation. Gentle mask ventilation is now considered acceptable during rapid sequence induction/intubation after loss of consciousness, hence reducing the incidence of hypoxia prior to tracheal intubation. Mask ventilation can be enhanced with muscle relaxation, a double C-E grip, and jaw thrust. This is particularly relevant for patients with reduced apnoea time. An awareness of the complications associated with mask ventilation may help reduce the morbidity associated with this technique. Effective ventilation technique and optimum device selection are important aspects for resuscitation of the newborn. Teaching correct establishment and maintenance of mask ventilation is essential for safe patient care. This review will examine some of the latest developments concerning mask ventilation for adult and paediatric patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. 361-404
Author(s):  
Jules Cranshaw ◽  
Emira Kursumovic ◽  
Tim Cook

This chapter provides detailed, practical and up-to-date information on management of the airway. It demystifies airway terminology, outlines airway assessment, and describes the management of the unanticipated difficult airway in adults. It includes a new section on intubating critically ill patients using the vortex approach, and outlines the equipment and techniques used to aid airway management. It gives practical information on the emergency front of neck airway and strategies to approach the obstructed airway. It explains rapid sequence induction, inhalational induction, awake tracheal intubation, and extubation after difficult intubation. It contains new sections on apnoeic oxygenation and how to manage patients with airborne respiratory viruses.


2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement 32) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
T. Mencke ◽  
M. Werth ◽  
H. Knoll ◽  
J.-U. Schreiber ◽  
C. Stracke ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny J. N. Wong ◽  
Kariem El-Boghdadly ◽  
Ruth Owen ◽  
Craig Johnstone ◽  
Mark D. Neuman ◽  
...  

Background Tracheal intubation for patients with COVID-19 is required for invasive mechanical ventilation. The authors sought to describe practice for emergency intubation, estimate success rates and complications, and determine variation in practice and outcomes between high-income and low- and middle-income countries. The authors hypothesized that successful emergency airway management in patients with COVID-19 is associated with geographical and procedural factors. Methods The authors performed a prospective observational cohort study between March 23, 2020, and October 24, 2020, which included 4,476 episodes of emergency tracheal intubation performed by 1,722 clinicians from 607 institutions across 32 countries in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation. The authors investigated associations between intubation and operator characteristics, and the primary outcome of first-attempt success. Results Successful first-attempt tracheal intubation was achieved in 4,017/4,476 (89.7%) episodes, while 23 of 4,476 (0.5%) episodes required four or more attempts. Ten emergency surgical airways were reported—an approximate incidence of 1 in 450 (10 of 4,476). Failed intubation (defined as emergency surgical airway, four or more attempts, or a supraglottic airway as the final device) occurred in approximately 1 of 120 episodes (36 of 4,476). Successful first attempt was more likely during rapid sequence induction versus non–rapid sequence induction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.39]; P < 0.001), when operators used powered air-purifying respirators versus nonpowered respirators (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.20]; P = 0.006), and when performed by operators with more COVID-19 intubations recorded (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03 for each additional previous intubation [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.06]; P = 0.015). Intubations performed in low- or middle-income countries were less likely to be successful at first attempt than in high-income countries (adjusted odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79]; P = 0.001). Conclusions The authors report rates of failed tracheal intubation and emergency surgical airway in patients with COVID-19 requiring emergency airway management, and identified factors associated with increased success. Risks of tracheal intubation failure and success should be considered when managing COVID-19. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zhao Li ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Jinwei Zheng ◽  
Qingxiu Wang

The present study aims to investigate whether intravenous dexmedetomidine shows superiority to esmolol for hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction. In the present meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for trials comparing dexmedetomidine with esmolol for the attenuation of the hemodynamic response to intubation. Ten trials were selected in the present meta-analysis. Compared to esmolol, the use of dexmedetomidine maintains stable heart rates (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 1 min, 3 min, and 5 min after tracheal intubation. Dexmedetomidine causes less hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation after rapid sequence induction compared with esmolol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document