Hamate Hook Fracture with Flexor Tendon Ruptures as a Golf Injury

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong-Min Kim ◽  
Jung Wook Paeng ◽  
Myung Jae Yoo ◽  
Sang-Hyun Woo
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 2315-2323 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. Netscher ◽  
Justin J. Badal

1960 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H. Boyes ◽  
James N. Wilson ◽  
James W. Smith

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yekta Gören ◽  
Michael Sauerbier ◽  
Annika Arsalan-Werner

The purpose of this study was to evaluate flexor tendon injuries following palmar plating of distal radial fractures relative to the Soong grade. This retrospective cohort study included 113 patients who underwent palmar plate removal after a distal radial fracture between 2010 and 2016. In 13 patients, a greater than 50% injury of the flexor pollicis longus tendon was observed. Of these, nine patients were classified as Soong grade 2, four as Soong grade 1 and none as grade 0. The difference between the Soong groups was statistically significant ( p = 0.006). Flexor tenosynovitis was present in eight patients (7%) and more likely in patients with a higher Soong grade ( p = 0.026). We conclude that higher Soong grades are associated with significantly more flexor tendon complications. Therefore, elective removal of the palmar plate after union of the fracture should be considered in patients with Soong grades 1 and 2. Level of evidence: IV


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 481-488
Author(s):  
Rui Hirasawa ◽  
Eichi Itadera ◽  
Seiji Okamoto

Background: Flexor tendon rupture is a major complication after volar locking plating for distal radius fracture (DRF). Few studies have investigated changes in the rate of postoperative flexor tendon rupture in patients with DRFs. The present study aimed to investigate the changes in the rate of postoperative flexor tendon rupture and to assess plate placement and reduction positions. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom more than 24 months had passed since DRF surgery. The patients were interviewed by telephone. Forty-nine patients (50 fractures; 2007–2009) from institution A were included in group 1 and 81 patients (84 fractures; 2013–2016) from institution B were included in group 2. The DRF surgery method was similar between the two groups. The rate of flexor tendon rupture, Soong classification grade, and radiological index (i.e., volar tilt [VT], radial inclination [RI], and ulnar variance [UV]) were statistically investigated in both groups. Results: Patient epidemiology was not significantly different between the two groups. The flexor tendon rupture rates were 2% and 0% in groups 1 and 2, respectively, without a significant difference. With regard to the Soong grade, 44 fractures were grade 2 and 6 were grade 1 in group 1, whereas 18 were grade 2, 38 were grade 1, and 28 were grade 0 in group 2, with a significant difference (p < 0.05). With regard to the radiological index, the mean VT values were 5° and 11° in groups 1 and 2, respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.05). However, RI and UV showed no significant difference. Conclusions: Plate placement and reduction positions, which are risk factors for flexor tendon ruptures after DRFs, have improved recently when compared with previous findings. With these changes, the rate of flexor tendon rupture is presumed to have decreased.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (02) ◽  
pp. 180-188
Author(s):  
Jasmin Shimin Lee ◽  
Duncan Angus McGrouther

Background: When closed ruptures of flexor tendons of fingers occur, there is often an identifiable pathology, which should be addressed in the same surgical setting as the tendon repair. The concept of “spontaneous” tendon rupture, occurring in the absence of identified pathology, however, has also been reported in a significant number of papers. This controversy has prompted us to do a review of the existing literature.Methods: We did a review of cases of closed ruptures of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) of the little finger in existing literature. Fifty-three publications were retrieved by searching “FDP tendon rupture” and “little finger” using PubMed database. We analyzed data such as the zone of rupture noted intra-operatively; and any precipitating factors, pathology or trauma. We also conducted a review on papers which discussed the concept of “spontaneous rupture”.Results: Fifty-three publications were retrieved. There were 8 cases of ruptures in Zone I; 2 in Zone II; 30 in Zone III; 59 in Zone IV and 5 in Zone V. Majority of cases were associated with an element of trauma of varying severity, or pathology. A precipitating cause was not documented in 12 cases. Amongst all 36 cases of ruptures labelled as “spontaneous”, only 1 case was truly “spontaneous” without any associated trauma or pathology.Conclusions: Most reports labeled as spontaneous rupture occurred in Zone III, where tendon ruptures are rare. There are documented pathological causes or evidence of trauma to most of these cases. We conclude these ruptures may have been mislabeled as spontaneous ruptures. Bearing in mind the propensity for tendon excursion, we suspect the lack of documentation of exploration in proximal zones contributed to this mislabeling. Understanding this concept of non-spontaneity to most tendon ruptures and the common sites of rupture or pathology is crucial for a surgeon to make strategic incisions and minimize future recurrence.


1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (sup275) ◽  
pp. 48-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panayotis N Soucacos ◽  
Alexandros E Beris ◽  
Konstantinos N Malizos ◽  
Theodore Xenakis ◽  
Alexandros Touliatos ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Hashizume ◽  
Keiichiro Nishida ◽  
Kazuo Fujiwara ◽  
Hajime Inoue

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. TOLAT ◽  
J. K. STANLEY

A technique is described of increasing the length of a palmaris longus tendon graft by including palmar aponeurosis. The additional 5 cm is often useful in treating high flexor tendon ruptures, especially at the wrist level, without the need for an additional incision.


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunori Kageyama ◽  
Michio Sano ◽  
Chiaki Ishihara ◽  
Yoshiji Suzuki ◽  
Akira Nagano

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document