Upstream Exploitation and Strategic Disclosure

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-938
Author(s):  
Liang Guo

Incentive to mitigate upstream exploitation by input suppliers can yield intermediate disclosure where both very good and very bad news are withheld even when disclosure is costless.

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan G. Brockbank ◽  
Karen M. Hennes

SYNOPSIS Managers have discretion over the day of the week and the time of day that 8-Ks are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), so they can elect to file an 8-K containing negative news at times with lower market attention. Several recent studies find various stock price-related incentives for strategic filing behavior for firms with publicly traded equity. In this study, we use 8-K filings from firms with public filings (mostly from public debt) but non-public equity ownership from 2004–2014 to explore the strategic timing behavior of firms without stock price motivations. Consistent with strategic disclosure, we find evidence that bad news 8-Ks are more likely to be filed when market attention is lower (just after markets close, on Fridays, and after markets close on Fridays) even absent stock price concerns. Cross-sectionally, we find more strategic timing for firms with external scrutiny from analysts and credit rating agencies, despite the sophistication of those market participants. Within firms, we also find more strategic timing around public debt offerings, a time of increased market scrutiny for private firms. Lastly, we use EDGAR download data to provide supporting evidence that strategic timing of bad news disclosures does reduce short-window stakeholder attention to the bad news. Overall, we provide evidence that privately owned firms behave strategically within the 8-K reporting rules despite the lack of stock price incentives.


2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Cen ◽  
Feng Chen ◽  
Yu Hou ◽  
Gordon D. Richardson

ABSTRACT In the presence of litigation-facing suppliers, the supply chain relationship is at risk. Suppliers with principal customers (dependent suppliers) have a higher concentration of sales to customers, and they are more at risk relative to suppliers without principal customers (non-dependent suppliers). As a result, we predict and find that litigation disclosure patterns differ for the two supplier types: dependent suppliers are more likely to delay bad news and accelerate good news related to litigation outcomes, compared to non-dependent suppliers. Such strategic disclosure patterns in our end-game setting are opposite to those documented in the existing supply chain literature for the repeated-game setting (for example, Hui, Klasa, and Yeung 2012). JEL Classifications: M41; M48; K22.


2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Dosanjh ◽  
Judy Barnes ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
Murray A. Straus
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Legg ◽  
Kate Sweeny
Keyword(s):  
Bad News ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document