scholarly journals Understanding Patient Referral Wait Times for Specialty Care in Ontario: A Retrospective Chart Audit

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clare Liddy ◽  
Nikhat Nawar ◽  
Isabella Moroz ◽  
Shelagh Mcrae ◽  
Christopher Russell ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscille Schettini ◽  
Kevin P Shah ◽  
Colin P O’Leary ◽  
Malhar P Patel ◽  
John B Anderson ◽  
...  

Introduction Health systems are seeking innovative solutions to improve specialty care access. Electronic consultations (eConsults) allow specialists to provide formal clinical recommendations to primary care providers (PCPs) based on patient chart review, without a face-to-face visit. Methods We implemented a nephrology eConsult pilot program within a large, academic primary care practice to facilitate timely communication between nephrologists and PCPs. We used primary care referral data to compare wait times and completion rates between traditional referrals and eConsults. We surveyed PCPs to assess satisfaction with the program. Results For traditional nephrology referrals placed during the study period (July 2016–March 2017), there was a 51-day median appointment wait time and a 40.9% referral completion rate. For eConsults, there was a median nephrologist response time of one day and a 100% completion rate; 67.5% of eConsults did not require a subsequent face-to-face specialty appointment. For eConsults that were converted to an in-person visit, the median wait time and completion rate were 40 days and 73.1%, respectively. Compared to traditional referrals placed during the study period, eConsults converted to in-person visits were more likely to be completed ( p = 0.001). Survey responses revealed that PCPs were highly satisfied with the program and consider the quick turnaround time as the greatest benefit. Discussion Our eConsult pilot program reduced nephrology wait times and significantly increased referral completion rates. In large integrated health systems, eConsults have considerable potential to improve access to specialty care, reduce unnecessary appointments, and optimize the patient population being seen by specialists.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liisa Jaakkimainen ◽  
Richard Glazier ◽  
Jan Barnsley ◽  
Erin Salkeld ◽  
Hong Lu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 266-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice L. Pringle ◽  
Aleksandra S. Milićević ◽  
Jaime A. Fawcett ◽  
Jerrold H. May ◽  
Shannon M. Kearney ◽  
...  

The current study evaluates changes in access as a result of the MyVA Access program—a system-wide effort to improve patient access in the Veterans Health Administration. Data on 20 different measures were collected, and changes were analyzed using t tests and Chow tests. Additionally, organizational health—how able a system is to create health care practice change—was evaluated for a sample of medical centers (n = 36) via phone interviews and surveys conducted with facility staff and technical assistance providers. An organizational health variable was created and correlated with the access measures. Results showed that, nationally, average wait times for urgent consults, new patient wait times for mental health and specialty care, and slot utilization for primary and specialty care patients improved. Patient satisfaction measures also improved, and patient complaints decreased. Better organizational health was associated with improvements in patient access.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody A. Hostutler ◽  
Katrina S. Hermetet ◽  
Edward S. Shapiro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document