Recommendations for endoscopic surveillance after esophageal atresia repair in adults

SUMMARY Background Endoscopic surveillance of adults with esophageal atresia is advocated, but the optimal surveillance strategy remains uncertain. This study aimed to provide recommendations on appropriate starting age and intervals of endoscopic surveillance in adults with esophageal atresia. Methods Participants underwent standardized upper endoscopies with biopsies. Surveillance intervals of 3–5 years were applied, depending on age and histopathological results. Patient’s age and time to development of (pre)malignant lesions were calculated. Results A total of 271 patients with esophageal atresia (55% male; median age at baseline endoscopy 26.7 (range 15.6–68.5) years; colon interposition n = 17) were included. Barrett’s esophagus was found in 19 (7%) patients (median age 32.3 (17.8–56.0) years at diagnosis). Youngest patient with a clinically relevant Barrett’s esophagus was 20.9 years. Follow-up endoscopies were performed in 108 patients (40%; median follow-up time 4.6 years). During surveillance, four patients developed Barrett’s esophagus but no dysplasia or cancer was found. One 45-year-old woman with a colon interposition developed an adenoma with high-grade dysplasia which was radically removed. Two new cases of esophageal carcinoma were diagnosed in patients (55 and 66 years old) who were not under surveillance. One of them had been curatively treated for esophageal carcinoma 13 years ago. Conclusions This study shows that endoscopic screening of patients with esophageal atresia, including those with a colon interposition, can be started at 20 years of age. Up to the age of 40 years a surveillance interval of 10 years appeared to be safe. Endoscopic surveillance may also be warranted for patients after curative esophageal cancer treatment.

CXCR4 peptide-based fluorescence endoscopy in a mouse model of Barrett’s esophagus

Background Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging has been emerging as a promising strategy to overcome the high number of early esophageal adenocarcinomas missed by white light endoscopy and random biopsy collection. We performed a preclinical assessment of fluorescence imaging and endoscopy using a novel CXCR4-targeted fluorescent peptide ligand in the L2-IL1B mouse model of Barrett’s esophagus. Methods Six L2-IL1B mice with advanced stage of disease (12–16 months old) were injected with the CXCR4-targeted, Sulfo-Cy5-labeled peptide (MK007), and ex vivo wide-field imaging of the whole stomach was performed 4 h after injection. Before ex vivo imaging, fluorescence endoscopy was performed in three L2-IL1B mice (12–14 months old) by a novel imaging system with two L2-IL1B mice used as negative controls. Results Ex vivo imaging and endoscopy in L2-IL1B mice showed that the CXCR4-targeted MK007 accumulated mostly in the dysplastic lesions with a mean target-to-background ratio > 2. The detection of the Sulfo-Cy5 signal in dysplastic lesions and its co-localization with CXCR4 stained cells by confocal microscopy further confirmed the imaging results. Conclusions This preliminary preclinical study shows that CXCR4-targeted fluorescence endoscopy using MK007 can detect dysplastic lesions in a mouse model of Barrett’s esophagus. Further investigations are needed to assess its use in the clinical setting.

Reflux, Barrett’s Esophagus, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Bariatric Surgery

We present the case of a patient who developed esophageal adenocarcinoma after a previous laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Bariatric surgery has emerged as the most effective treatment option for weight loss and obesity-related diseases; however, sleeve gastrectomy promotes gastroesophageal reflux and leads to Barrett’s esophagus in a substantial portion of patients. The natural history of Barrett’s esophagus in these patients is unknown, and active surveillance is recommended until the incidence of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in this population is clarified. Management options for these patients include conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Although esophagectomy in patients who have previously undergone sleeve gastrectomy may require an alternative conduit, the remnant stomach can be used in carefully selected patients. Here, we review the different weight loss procedures, their effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus, and the treatment options for patients with esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy. We report the use of preoperative coil embolization as a means of vascular preconditioning before successful use of a gastric conduit.

Post Endoscopy Barrett’s Neoplasia (PEBN) After A Negative Index Endoscopy: A Systematic Review & Proposal For Definitions and Performance Measures in Endoscopy

Background and aims: A high rate of neoplasia (high grade dysplasia; HGD and esophageal adenocarcinoma; EAC) has been reported in Barrett’s Esophagus at index endoscopy but precise rates of post endoscopy Barrett’s neoplasia (PEBN) are unknown. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed examining electronic databases (inception to October 2021) for studies reporting PEBN. Consistent with definitions of Post Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer as proposed by the World Endoscopy Organization, we defined neoplasia(HGD/EAC) detected at index endoscopy and/or within 6 months of a negative index endoscopy as “prevalent” neoplasia; those detected after 6 months of a negative index endoscopy and prior to next surveillance interval(i.e. 3 years) as PEBN or “interval” neoplasia, and those detected after 36 months of a negative index endoscopy as “incident” neoplasia. Pooled incidence rates and proportion relative to total neoplasia were analyzed. Results: 11 studies (n=59,795, age:62.3±3.3 years, 61%males) met inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence rates were: prevalent neoplasia 4.5% (95%confidence interval: 2.2-8.9) at baseline and additional 0.3%(0.1-0.7) within first 6 months, PEBN 0.52%(0.48-0.58) and incident neoplasia: 1.41%(0.93-2.14). At 3 years from index endoscopy, PEBN accounted for 3% while prevalent neoplasia accounted for 97% of total Barrett’s neoplasia. Conclusion: Neoplasia detected at or within 6 months of index endoscopy account for most of the Barrett’s neoplasia(>90%). Post-Endoscopy Barrett’s Neoplasia account for ~3% of cases and can be used for validation in future. This highlights the importance of a high-quality index endoscopy in Barrett’s Esophagus and the need to establish quality benchmarks to measure endoscopists’ performance.

Esophageal abnormalities and the risk for gastroesophageal cancers—a histopathology-register-based study in Sweden

Background The poor survival of patients with gastroesophageal cancers may improve if additional esophageal precursor lesions to Barrett’s esophagus and squamous dysplasia are identified. We estimated the risk for gastroesophageal cancers among patients with various histopathological abnormalities in the esophagus, including Barrett’s esophagus, subdivided by histopathological types. Methods Histopathology data from esophageal biopsies obtained 1979–2014 were linked with several national population-based registers in Sweden. Patients were followed from 2 years after the first biopsy date until cancer, death, emigration, esophagectomy/gastrectomy or end of follow-up, 31st of December 2016, whichever came first. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) as measures of relative risk with the Swedish general population as reference. Results In total 367 esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases were ascertained during 831,394 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate (IR) for EAC was 0.1 per 1000 person-years for normal morphology, 0.2–0.5 for inflammatory changes, and 0.8–2.9 for metaplasia. The IR was 1.0 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval 0.7–1.3) among patients with non-dysplastic intestinal metaplasia, 0.9 (0.8–1.1) in non-dysplastic gastric/glandular metaplasia and 2.9 (2.0–4.2) among columnar metaplasia patients with low-grade dysplasia. The SIRs were 11.7 (95% confidence interval 8.6–15.5), 12.0 (10.0–14.2) and 30.2 (20.5–42.8), respectively. The SIRs for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) were moderately elevated. Conclusions For the first time, we demonstrate that patients with esophageal inflammatory and other metaplastic abnormalities than Barrett’s esophagus have an increased risk of EAC and GCA compared to the general population. Moreover, patients with different histopathologic subtypes of Barrett’s esophagus have a comparable risk for EAC.