Spray application volume test in apple and pear orchards in Catalonia (Spain) and Variable Rate Technology for dose adjustment.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Escolà ◽  
Ferran Camp ◽  
Francesc Solanelles ◽  
Santiago Planas ◽  
Felip Gracia ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Bullock ◽  
Matías L. Ruffo ◽  
Donald G. Bullock ◽  
Germán A. Bollero

HortScience ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1522-1530
Author(s):  
Lauren Fessler ◽  
Amy Fulcher ◽  
Dave Lockwood ◽  
Wesley Wright ◽  
Heping Zhu

Advanced variable-rate spray technology, which applies pesticides based on real-time scanning laser rangefinder measurements of plant presence, size, and density, was developed and retrofitted to existing sprayers. Experiments were conducted to characterize the application of four programmed spray rates (0.03, 0.05, 0.07, or 0.09 L·m−3 of crop geometric volume) when applied to Malus domestica Borkh. ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees using this crop sensing technology. Water-sensitive cards (WSCs) were used as samplers to quantify spray coverage, deposits, and deposit density in the target and nontarget areas, and an overspray index based on a threshold of greater than 30% coverage was calculated. The application rate ranged from 262 L·ha−1 at the programmed spray rate of 0.03 L·m−3 to 638 L·ha−1 at the rate of 0.09 L·m−3. For a given WSC position, spray coverage and deposits increased as the spray rate increased. WSC positions 1 and 2 were oversprayed at all rates. The effect of spray rate on deposit density varied with WSC positions, with high densities achieved by low spray rates for WSCs closest to the sprayer but by high spray rates for WSCs positioned either deeper within or under the canopy. When coalescing deposits were accounted for, deposit densities met or exceeded the recommended pesticide application thresholds (insecticides 20–30 droplets/cm2; fungicides 50–70 droplets/cm2) at all WSC positions for each spray rate tested. The lowest spray rate reduced off-target loss to the orchard floor by 81% compared with the highest rate, dramatically reducing potential exposure to nontarget organisms, such as foraging pollinators, to come into contact with pesticide residues. Applying the lowest rate of 0.03 L·m−3 met deposit density efficacy levels while reducing spray volume by 83% compared with the orchard standard application of 1540 L·ha−1 and by 87% compared with the 1950 L·ha−1 application rate recommended when using the tree row volume method. Thus, there is potential for growers to refine pesticide application rates to further achieve significant pesticide cost savings. Producers of other woody crops, such as nursery, citrus, and grapes, who use air-assisted sprayers, may be able to achieve similar savings by refining pesticide applications through the use of laser rangefinder-based spray application technology.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isti Surjandari ◽  
Marvin T Batte ◽  
Mario J Miranda

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tajudeen Abiodun Ishola ◽  
Azmi Yahya ◽  
AbdulRashid Mohammed S ◽  
Samsuzana Abd Aziz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document