Single Balloon Enteroscopy in Comparison to Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Disease

2008 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. S111-S112
Author(s):  
Mayar Al Mohajer ◽  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
Joseph Palascak ◽  
Andres Gelrud
2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Manno ◽  
Maria Elena Riccioni ◽  
Renato Cannizzaro ◽  
Arnaldo Andreoli ◽  
Riccardo Marmo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. E96-E102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarida Marques ◽  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Rosa Coelho ◽  
Hélder Cardoso ◽  
Filipe Vilas Boas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Clinical impact of single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) is fairly known, as well as its diagnostic yield comparing with other small bowel gastrointestinal investigations. This study represents a contribution to better understand it and is designed to evaluate SBE efficacy and degree of concordance with previous evaluation of small bowel. Patients and methods This is a single-center retrospective study of patients that underwent SBE with suspected small bowel disease based on non-invasive imaging. Demographic, clinical, procedural and outcome data were collected for analysis. Agreement beyond positive findings was evaluated using κ-coefficient. Results A total of 197 SBEs were performed in 168 patients; mainly men (64.3 %) with mean age 53.3±17.6 years. Most SBEs (86.3 %) performed were preceded by a noninvasive evaluation: in 61.4 % (n = 119) of cases, capsule enteroscopy (CE) was performed, in 18.8 % (n = 37), computed tomography was performed, and in 6.1 % (n = 12) magnetic resonance enterography was performed. Fourty-three patients (25.6 %) underwent endoscopic treatments, mainly: argon plasma coagulation in angioectasias (53.4 %) and polypectomy (34.9 %). The most common diagnoses made with SBE were findings consistent with inflammatory small bowel disease (21.8 %) and vascular lesions (14.2 %). The diagnostic yield of SBE was of 69 %, confirming the suspicion of small bowel disease. The degree of concordance between CE and SBE for positive findings was substantial, κ-coefficient = 0.635 (P < 0.001). However, the degree of concordance between imaging examinations (CT or MR) and SBE was only moderate, κ-coefficient = 0.410 (P < 0.001). SBE had an immediate effect in 20 % of patients, changing diagnostic approaches, medical and surgical treatments. Conclusions Our study supports the idea that for suspected small bowel disease, CE and SBE have an overall good degree of concordance for all the diagnostics included.


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB368-AB369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka ◽  
Sabrina Vannoy ◽  
Himabindu Yerneni ◽  
Bhanu Prasad Kosuru ◽  
Bennie R. Upchurch ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabana F. Pasha ◽  
Jonathan A. Leighton ◽  
Ananya Das ◽  
M. Edwyn Harrison ◽  
G. Anton Decker ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Pennazio ◽  
Tatiana Sprujevnik ◽  
Arrigo Arrigoni ◽  
Alberto Bertone ◽  
Mariella Cavallero ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document