scholarly journals Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-247
Author(s):  
Alexander D. Sherry ◽  
Dario Pasalic ◽  
G. Brandon Gunn ◽  
C. David Fuller ◽  
Jack Phan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT. Patients and Methods Toxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns. Results Fourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus–positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively. Conclusion Therefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.

2019 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-192
Author(s):  
T. Kennel ◽  
R. Garrel ◽  
V. Costes ◽  
P. Boisselier ◽  
L. Crampette ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-450
Author(s):  
R Mistry ◽  
A Walker ◽  
D Kim ◽  
E Ofo

Introduction Head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary represents 1–5% of all head and neck cancers and presents a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. In approximately 40% of cases, a primary tumour location remains unknown despite investigation. With advancements in our understanding of the role of high-risk human papilloma virus in head and neck cancer, transoral robotic surgery presents an option for diagnosis and therapy. Materials and methods This is a retrospective case series from a single centre. Case notes were reviewed for 28 patients who had transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary between May 2015 and July 2019. Results Transoral robotic surgery identified an oropharyngeal primary tumour in 19 of 28 (67.8%) patients. All oropharyngeal primaries were p16 positive. The base of tongue identification rate was 63.2%. Median length of inpatient stay postoperatively was 1.0 day. Normal oral intake resumed within 48 hours in 96% (27/28) of patients. Three patients (10.3%) suffered minor postoperative bleeds that were all managed conservatively. Discussion The base of tongue primary identification rate (63.2%) in this series is consistent with that previously reported (43–63%; 95% confidence interval). Primary tumour identification rate if a patient is p16 positive is 86.3% (19/22), with 100% of these being oropharyngeal. We suggest future investigation into p16 status as a means of stratifying patients with head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary for transoral robotic surgery. Conclusion Transoral robotic base of tongue mucosectomy (or lingual tonsillectomy) is a promising technique that offers a high yield of positive identification for the primary tumour. It is well tolerated with minimal associated morbidity. Our findings are comparable with those in the current literature.


2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (3) ◽  
pp. 691-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amardeep S. Grewal ◽  
Karthik Rajasekaran ◽  
Steven B. Cannady ◽  
Ara A. Chalian ◽  
Alireza F. Ghiam ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 ◽  
pp. S641-S642
Author(s):  
F. Podeur ◽  
P. Pommier ◽  
J. Ton Van ◽  
E. Monchet ◽  
D. Girodet ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Diako Berzenji ◽  
Dominiek A. Monserez ◽  
Gerda M. Verduijn ◽  
Emilie A.C. Dronkers ◽  
Peter P. Jansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document