1937 AWARD: ABOUT THE HUMAN RELATIONS IN THE CIVIL WAR AND AFTERWARDS

Author(s):  
MARGARET M. MITCHELL
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Judith Giesberg

Civil War soldiers enjoyed unprecedented access to obscene materials of all sorts, including mass-produced erotic fiction, carte de visite, playing cards, and stereographs. With a series of antebellum legal, technological, and commercial developments as a foundation, the concentration of men into armies ushered in a wartime triumph of pornography. Illicit materials entered camps in haversacks, through the mail, or sold by sutlers; soldiers found it discarded on the ground and civilians discovered it in abandoned camps. Little of it survived the war, though, as soldiers did not keep it and archives did not collect it. Even so, porn raised concerns among reformers and lawmakers who launched a postwar campaign to combat it. At the war’s end, a victorious, resurgent nation-state sought to assert its moral authority by redefining human relations of the most intimate sort, including the regulation of sex and reproduction, most evident in the Comstock Laws, a federal law and a series of state measures outlawing pornography, contraception, and abortion. Sex and the Civil War is the first book to take the erotica and pornography that men read and shared seriously and to link the postwar reaction to porn to debates about the future of sex and marriage.


2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-49
Author(s):  
Rachel St. John

This article highlights how Americans used intertwined arguments about space and geography to justify and denounce different territorial configurations from the late eighteenth century through the Civil War. These arguments wove together ideas about geography (a set of physical, topographical features) and space (the human constructs that shape movement and human relations) in everything from theoretical arguments about the ideal size of republics to specific ideas about how rivers, mountains, oceans, and other features related to the proper shape of the nation. Americans evoked a variety of assumptions about how the physical landscape shaped human activity. They also made arguments about space and the ways that places were physically, and thus should be politically, connected. Highlighting an underappreciated current of manifest disunion, this article illustrates how different factions used geographic and spatial arguments not only to support and condemn varied expansionist visions, but also to justify disunion and secession.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Hartzell ◽  
Matthew Hoddie
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Smele
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Barbara F. Walter
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Lars-Erik Cederman ◽  
Kristian Skrede Gleditsch ◽  
Halvard Buhaug
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document