scholarly journals How to name new chemical elements (IUPAC Recommendations 2016)

2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem H. Koppenol ◽  
John Corish ◽  
Javier García-Martínez ◽  
Juris Meija ◽  
Jan Reedijk

AbstractA procedure is proposed to name new chemical elements. After the discovery of a new element is established by the joint IUPAC-IUPAP Working Group, the discoverers are invited to propose a name and a symbol to the IUPAC Inorganic Chemistry Division. Elements can be named after a mythological concept, a mineral, a place or country, a property or a scientist. After examination and acceptance by the Inorganic Chemistry Division, the proposal follows the accepted IUPAC procedure and is then ratified by the Council of IUPAC. This document is a slightly amended version of the 2002 IUPAC Recommendations; the most important change is that the names of all new elements should have an ending that reflects and maintains historical and chemical consistency. This would be in general “-ium” for elements belonging to groups 1–16, i.e. including the f-block elements, “-ine” for elements of group 17 and “-on” for elements of group 18.

2002 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Koppenol

A procedure is proposed to name new elements. After the discovery of a new element is established by a joint IUPAC­IUPAP Working Group, the discoverers are invited to propose a name and a symbol to the IUPAC Inorganic Chemistry Division. Elements can be named after a mythological concept, a mineral, a place or country, a property, or a scientist. After examination and acceptance by the Inorganic Chemistry Division, the proposal follows the accepted IUPAC procedure and is then submitted to the IUPAC Council for approval.


2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 753-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Tatsumi ◽  
John Corish

A joint IUPAC/IUPAP Working Party (JWP) has confirmed the discovery of the element with atomic number 112. In accord with IUPAC procedures, the discoverers proposed a name, copernicium, and symbol, Cn, for the element. The IUPAC Inorganic Chemistry Division Committee recommended this proposal for acceptance, and it has now been approved by the IUPAC Bureau as delegated to act by the IUPAC Council meeting on 12 August 2007.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31
Author(s):  
Norman E. Holden ◽  
Tyler B. Coplen ◽  
Peter Mahaffy

Abstract Two years ago, the King’s Centre for Visualization in Science (KCVS) at The King’s University, Edmonton released a new digital interactive version of the IUPAC Periodic Table of the Elements and Isotopes with accompanying educational resources at an International Conference on Chemistry Education. It can be found at www.isotopesmatter.com. The effort was part of an IUPAC project [1]. The science behind this new table was developed by Inorganic Chemistry Division scientists working for over a decade on an earlier IUPAC project [2]. These projects were joint efforts between the IUPAC Committee on Chemistry Education (CCE) and the Inorganic Chemistry Division.


2004 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 2101-2103 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Corish ◽  
G. M. Rosenblatt

A joint IUPAC-IUPAP Working Party (JWP) confirmed the discovery of element number 111. In accord with IUPAC procedures, the discoverers proposed a name and symbol for the element. The Inorganic Chemistry Division recommended this proposal for acceptance, and it was adopted by IUPAC on 1 November 2004. The recommended name is roentgenium with symbol Rg.


2016 ◽  
Vol 88 (12) ◽  
pp. 1225-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Öhrström ◽  
Jan Reedijk

AbstractA joint IUPAC/IUPAP Working Party (JWP) has confirmed the discovery of the elements with atomic numbers (Z) 113, 115, 117 and 118. In accordance with the 2016 IUPAC guideline for naming new elements, the discoverers were invited to propose names and symbols for the elements. Claims have been assigned to them and the following are proposed: (a) nihonium and symbol Nh, for the element with Z=113, (b) moscovium with the symbol Mc, for the element with Z=115, (c) tennessine with the symbol Ts, for the element with Z=117, and oganesson with the symbol Og, for the element with Z=118. After careful deliberation on these names and symbols, considering the 2016 rules and a public review period, the Inorganic Chemistry Division recommended these proposals for acceptance by the IUPAC Council.


2004 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1715-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. Ts. Oganessian

One of the fundamental outcomes of nuclear theory is the predicted existence of increased stability in the region of unknown superheavy elements. This hypothesis, proposed more than 35 years ago and intensively developed during all this time, significantly extends the limits of existence of chemical elements. “Magic ”nuclei with closed proton and neutron shells possess maximum binding energy. For the heaviest nuclides, a considerable stability is predicted close to the deformed shells with Z = 108, N = 162. Even higher stability is expected for the neutron-rich nuclei close to the spherical shells with Z = 114 (possibly also at Z = 120, 122) and N = 184, coming next to the well-known “doubly magic ”nucleus 208 Pb. The present paper describes the experiments aimed at the synthesis of nuclides with Z = 113–116, 118 and N = 170–177, produced in the fusion reactions of the heavy isotopes of Pu, Am, Cm, and Cf with 48Ca projectiles.The energies and half-lives of the new nuclides, as well as those of their daughter nuclei (Z < 113) qualitatively agree with the theoretical predictions. The question, which is the nucleus, among the superheavy ones, that has the longest half-life is also considered. It has been shown that, if the lifetime of the most stable isotopes, in particular, the isotopes of element 108 (Hs), is ≥ 5 ×107 years, they can be found in natu ral objects. The experiments were carried out during 2001–2003 in the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions (JINR, Dubna) in collaboration with the Analytical and Nuclear Chemistry Division (LLNL, Livermore).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document