Strength and Muscular Adaptations After 6 Weeks of Rest-Pause vs. Traditional Multiple-Sets Resistance Training in Trained Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S113-S121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonato Prestes ◽  
Ramires A. Tibana ◽  
Eduardo de Araujo Sousa ◽  
Dahan da Cunha Nascimento ◽  
Pollyanna de Oliveira Rocha ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Moreno‐Cabañas ◽  
Juan Fernando Ortega ◽  
Felix Morales‐Palomo ◽  
Miguel Ramirez‐Jimenez ◽  
Laura Alvarez‐Jimenez ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Witalo Kassiano ◽  
Bruna Daniella de Vasconcelos Costa ◽  
João Pedro Nunes ◽  
Andreo Fernando Aguiar ◽  
Belmiro F. de Salles ◽  
...  

AbstractSpecialized resistance training techniques (e.g., drop-set, rest-pause) are commonly used by well-trained subjects for maximizing muscle hypertrophy. Most of these techniques were designed to allow a greater training volume (i.e., total repetitions×load), due to the supposition that it elicits greater muscle mass gains. However, many studies that compared the traditional resistance training configuration with specialized techniques seek to equalize the volume between groups, making it difficult to determine the inherent hypertrophic potential of these advanced strategies, as well as, this equalization restricts part of the practical extrapolation on these findings. In this scenario, the objectives of this manuscript were 1) to present the nuance of the evidence that deals with the effectiveness of these specialized resistance training techniques and — primarily — to 2) propose possible ways to explore the hypertrophic potential of such strategies with greater ecological validity without losing the methodological rigor of controlling possible intervening variables; and thus, contributing to increasing the applicability of the findings and improving the effectiveness of hypertrophy-oriented resistance training programs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 2909-2918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad J. Schoenfeld ◽  
Nicholas A. Ratamess ◽  
Mark D. Peterson ◽  
Bret Contreras ◽  
G. T. Sonmez ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviv Emanuel ◽  
Itzhak Rozen Smukas ◽  
Israel Halperin

Purpose: The feeling scale (FS) is a unique and underexplored scale in sport sciences that measures affective valence. FS has the potential to be used in athletic environments as a monitoring and prescription tool. We sought to examine whether FS ratings, as measured on a repetition-by-repetition basis, can predict proximity to task-failure and bar velocity across different exercises and loads. Methods: On the first day, 20 trained subjects (10 females) completed 1RM tests in the barbell bench and squat exercises and were introduced to the FS. On the following three sessions, subjects completed three sets to task-failure with either 1) 70%1RM bench-press, 2) 70%1RM squat (squat-70%), or 3) 80%1RM squat (squat-80%). Sessions were completed in a randomized, counter-balanced order. After every completed repetition, subjects verbally reported their FS ratings. Bar velocity was measured via linear position transducer. Results: FS ratings predicted failure-proximity and bar velocity in all three conditions (p<0.001, R2 range: 0.66-0.85). Specifically, a reduction of one unit in the FS corresponded to approaching task-failure by 14%, 11% and 11%, and to a reduction in bar velocity of 10%, 4% and 3%, in the bench, squat-70% and squat-80%, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate if the FS can be used in RT environments among trained subjects, on a repetition-by-repetition basis. The results show strong predictive abilities of the FS, indicating that the scale can be used to monitor and prescribe resistance training, and that its benefits should be further explored.


Life Sciences ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 238 ◽  
pp. 116964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila S. Padilha ◽  
Paola S. Cella ◽  
Alex S. Ribeiro ◽  
Fabrício A. Voltarelli ◽  
Mayra T.J. Testa ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 842
Author(s):  
Michihiro Kon ◽  
Takeo Matsubayashi ◽  
Tatsuaki Ikeda ◽  
Akiko Honda ◽  
Nao Ohiwa ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard McMahon ◽  
Christopher I. Morse ◽  
Adrian Burden ◽  
Keith Winwood ◽  
Gladys Leopoldine Onambélé

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 1391-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Walker ◽  
Frangois Brunotte ◽  
Inès Rouhier-Marcer ◽  
Yves Cottin ◽  
Jean-Marie Casillas ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1821-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad J. Schoenfeld ◽  
Nicholas A. Ratamess ◽  
Mark D. Peterson ◽  
Bret Contreras ◽  
Gul Tiryaki-Sonmez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document