Diagnostic pitfalls in fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Tseleni-Balafouta
2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 213-224
Author(s):  
C. Kobe ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
H. Schicha ◽  
M. Dietlein

Summary:The incidentally detected thyroid nodule using sonography is described as incidentaloma; the most nodules have a diameter up to 1.5 cm. Sonography will detect thyroid nodules in more than 20% of the population in Germany. Epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of malignancy in such incidentalomas are missing. The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer is about 3 per 100,000 people and year. However, several monocentric studies have shown a prevalence of malignancy of up to 10% of the thyroid nodules in selected patients’ group. The histology did not found microcarcinomas only, but also small cancer with infiltration of the thyroid capsule, lymph node metastasis or multifocal spread. The studies were not designed for outcome measurement after early and incidental detection of small thyroid cancers. Hypoechogenity, ill defined borders, central hypervascularization or microcalcifications were used as combined criteria for risk stratification. The second method for risk stratification is scintigraphy and further tests are warranted for hypofunctioning nodule ≥1 cm. Additionally, the family history, patient’s age <20 years, former radiation of the neck, and measurement of calcitonin should be regarded. Without such a risk stratification selection for fine needle aspiration is impossible. Fine needle aspiration of non-palpable incidentalomas led to non-representative or unequivocal cytological findings in up to 40%. Because better outcome of incidentally detected small thyroid carcinomas is not proved and because sonography, scintigraphy and fine needle aspiration remain imprecise regarding dignity of incidentalomas, fine needle aspiration is not the standard for small, non-palpable thyroid nodules. Conclusion: For management of incidentaloma, sonographically unsuspicious, scintigraphically indifferent (nodules ≥1 cm) and without any risk factors in patients’ history, wait and see is justified when patient is informed about the problem.


Author(s):  
Silpa Kadiyala ◽  
Poonam Agarwal ◽  
V Suresh ◽  
Amith Chowhan ◽  
AY Lakshmi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manijeh Mohammadi ◽  
Carrie Betel ◽  
Kirsteen Rennie Burton ◽  
Kevin McLughlin Higgins ◽  
Zeina Ghorab ◽  
...  

Objective To determine the incidence of malignancy, follow-up ultrasound (US), and repeat fine needle aspiration (FNA) in thyroid nodules that have been previously biopsied as benign. Methods This is a retrospective, descriptive study of benign thyroid nodules evaluated by US between 2010-2011. We determined the frequency of follow-up ultrasounds and FNAs, mean years of follow-up, interval between follow-up US, change in nodule size, reasons for repeat FNA (rFNA), frequency of thyroidectomy, and thyroid malignancy during 5 years of follow-up. Results A total of 733 benign thyroid nodules were reviewed in 615 patients. Mean years of US follow-up was 3.47 ± 1.65 years; 275 (37.5%) had no follow-up US; 109 (14.9%) had 1 follow-up US; 93 (12.7%) had 2 follow-up US; and 256 (34.9%) had 3 or more follow-up US. Assessment of thyroid nodule size showed that 215 (28.8%) nodules decreased in size, 145 (19.4%) increased in size by less than 50%, and 91 (12.1%) increased in size by more than 50%. Of the 733 nodules, 17 nodules (2.3%) underwent thyroidectomy for which the pathology result of 9 (1.2%) showed malignancy, and 65 (8.9%) thyroid nodules underwent rFNA. When applying the 2015 recommendations for repeat FNA, 35% were done unnecessarily. Conclusion In our sample of initially benign thyroid nodules, only 9 patients (1.2%) had pathology-proven malignancy after a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Over 30% of patients had more than 3 rUSs. Decreased interval and frequency of rUS should be considered in future guidelines for thyroid management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 853-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Partyka ◽  
Karen Trevino ◽  
Melissa L. Randolph ◽  
Harvey Cramer ◽  
Howard H. Wu

Author(s):  
Hyeung Kyoo Kim ◽  
Soo Young Kim ◽  
Yong Sang Lee ◽  
Euy Young Soh ◽  
Hang-Seok Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document