Does a 60 minute sample in addition to a 30 minute sample for cortisol in the Short Synacthen Test alter patient management?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Campbell ◽  
Iona Galloway ◽  
Donna Grant ◽  
Frances Smith ◽  
Jillian Tough ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Maria Michaelidou ◽  
Ghasem Yadegarfar ◽  
Lauren Morris ◽  
Samantha Dolan ◽  
Adam Robinson ◽  
...  

The Short Synacthen Test is the way that we most often determine whether people’s adrenal glands are working. We here have shown that an extra blood sample taken at 60 minutes post Synacthen vs a 30 minute sample alone, may make the test more effective at excluding those people who do not need to go on hydrocortisone supplementation or need further evaluation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 75 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Michaelidou ◽  
Ghasem Yadegarfar ◽  
Lauren Morris ◽  
Samantha Dolan ◽  
Adam Robinson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 766-767
Author(s):  
Carol Evans ◽  
Nadia El-Farhan ◽  
David Ducroq ◽  
Aled Rees

2019 ◽  
Vol 96 (1138) ◽  
pp. 467-472
Author(s):  
Rajeev Kumar ◽  
Peter Carr ◽  
Kimberley Moore ◽  
Zeeshan Rajput ◽  
Louise Ward ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe short synacthen test (SST) is widely used across the UK to assess adrenal reserve but there remains no consensus on the timing of cortisol sampling to help diagnose adrenal insufficiency. The main objective of our study was to see if both 30 and 60 min sample are required following administration of synacthen to investigate suspected adrenal insufficiency (AI).DesignThis was a single-centre retrospective study of 393 SSTs measuring 0, 30 and 60 min cortisol levels after administration of 250 µg of synacthen.Patients and methodsAll the SSTs for patients suspected of primary or secondary AI between April 2016 and October 2018 were included in this study. The tests were performed as per our hospital protocol. A post-adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) cortisol response of 420 nmol/L at any time point was considered adequate to rule out AI. The data were analysed to ascertain the proportion of patients who achieved this level at 30 and/or 60 min.ResultsA total of 393 SST results were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether (group A) or not (group B) they were on steroids. Overall, a total of 313 (79.6%) subjects achieved cortisol level of ≥420 nmol/L at 30 and 60 min while 19 (4.8%) had late response (ie, insufficient 30 min cortisol levels, rising to ≥420 nmol/L at 60 min). Another 61 subjects (15.5%) showed insufficient response at both 30 and 60 min (ie, failed to achieved level of ≥420 nmol/L). Importantly, there was no patient in either group who had adequate response at 30 min and then failed at 60 min. Patients in group A were more likely to have inadequate response at both 30 and 60 min while patients in group B were more likely to have normal response at both time points.ConclusionsOur results suggest that about 5% of people undergoing SST may be inappropriately diagnosed as having AI (and subjected to long-term unnecessary steroid treatment) if the 60 min sample is not maintained. We suggest that 30 min sample does not add any additional diagnostic utility and can be omitted thus simplifying SST even further and saving on cost and resources. We propose that single measurement after 60 min of administration of synthetic ACTH is a sufficient screening test for AI.


1999 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Stewart ◽  
Penny Clark

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document