scholarly journals Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata

Genetics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 201 (3) ◽  
pp. 1239-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina McGuigan ◽  
J. David Aguirre ◽  
Mark W. Blows
2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (31) ◽  
pp. e2026217118
Author(s):  
Robert J. Dugand ◽  
J. David Aguirre ◽  
Emma Hine ◽  
Mark W. Blows ◽  
Katrina McGuigan

Genetic variance is not equal for all multivariate combinations of traits. This inequality, in which some combinations of traits have abundant genetic variation while others have very little, biases the rate and direction of multivariate phenotypic evolution. However, we still understand little about what causes genetic variance to differ among trait combinations. Here, we investigate the relative roles of mutation and selection in determining the genetic variance of multivariate phenotypes. We accumulated mutations in an outbred population of Drosophila serrata and analyzed wing shape and size traits for over 35,000 flies to simultaneously estimate the additive genetic and additive mutational (co)variances. This experimental design allowed us to gain insight into the phenotypic effects of mutation as they arise and come under selection in naturally outbred populations. Multivariate phenotypes associated with more (less) genetic variance were also associated with more (less) mutational variance, suggesting that differences in mutational input contribute to differences in genetic variance. However, mutational correlations between traits were stronger than genetic correlations, and most mutational variance was associated with only one multivariate trait combination, while genetic variance was relatively more equal across multivariate traits. Therefore, selection is implicated in breaking down trait covariance and resulting in a different pattern of genetic variance among multivariate combinations of traits than that predicted by mutation and drift. Overall, while low mutational input might slow evolution of some multivariate phenotypes, stabilizing selection appears to reduce the strength of evolutionary bias introduced by pleiotropic mutation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Collet ◽  
Jacqueline L Sztepanacz

AbstractThe total strength of sexual selection on males depends on the relationship between various components of pre- and post-copulatory fitness. Misalignment between male and female interests creates inter-locus sexual conflict, where the fitness of one sex is increased at the expense of the other. Although rarely considered, mating behaviours can also be genetically correlated between males and females, creating intra-locus sexual conflict, where beneficial alleles in one sex are costly when expressed in the other sex. How inter- and intra-locus sexual conflicts operate on the expression of mating behaviours remains little understood. Here, we study male attractiveness, mating latency and copulation duration in two populations of the polyandrous Drosophila serrata. Univariate analyses show little genetic variance in mating latency, and that males, but not females, contribute to copulation duration genetic variance. Further, multivariate analyses revealed little covariance between the studied traits. However, analyses considering male and female contribution in a single framework supported genetic contributions from both sexes for mating behaviours and complex patterns of between sexes correlations. Finally, our study did not find any association between those mating behaviours and fitness component, specifically (i) no phenotypic covariance between male attractiveness and mating latency and, (ii) longer copulations did not result in the production of more offspring. With no detectable fitness benefits in any sexes for shorter mating latency or longer copulation duration, our results do not support the presence of inter-nor intra-locus sexual conflict for these mating traits.


1985 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Patel ◽  
K. S. Bains ◽  
G. S. Chahal

A new mating procedure for estimating additive and dominance genetic variances in a random mating population is presented. With this procedure, m number of plants from a random mating population are selfed to produce S1 families and are also crossed to n inbreds. Subsequently, all the m × n hybrids are selfed. while keeping remnant crossed seeds for the final experiment. The final experiment comprises m × n hybrids, their m × n selfs, m S1, and m S2 families as well as n inbreds. The analysis of the data, recorded on the quantitative traits provides information for both the random mating as well as the inbred populations. Epistasis can be detected by two different tests. The analysis can be applied to F2 instead of random mating populations with less effort.Key words: random mating, genetic variance, epistasis, inbred.


Genetics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 206 (4) ◽  
pp. 2185-2198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline L. Sztepanacz ◽  
Katrina McGuigan ◽  
Mark W. Blows

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document