scholarly journals A Comparative Neuroprimatological Study on the Inferior Olivary Nuclei (from the STEPHAN'S Collection).

1992 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shozo MATANO
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Gyum Kim ◽  
Young-Bin Park ◽  
Sun-Uk Lee ◽  
Sung-Wook Yu ◽  
Kun-Woo Park ◽  
...  

1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Frederic ◽  
F. Hainaut ◽  
M. Thomasset ◽  
J. L. Guenet ◽  
N. Delhaye-Bouchaud ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 645-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Barragan ◽  
N. Delhaye-Bouchaud ◽  
P. Laget

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 861-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chedotal ◽  
E. Bloch-Gallego ◽  
C. Sotelo

The formation of the olivocerebellar projection is supposed to be regulated by positional information shared between pre- and postsynaptic neurons. However, experimental evidence to support this hypothesis is missing. In the chick, caudal neurons in the inferior olive project to the anterior cerebellum and rostral ones to the posterior cerebellum. We here report in vitro experiments that strongly support the existence of anteroposterior polarity cues in the embryonic cerebellum. We developed an in vitro system that was easily accessible to experimental manipulations. Large hindbrain explants of E7.5-E8 chick embryos, containing the cerebellum and its attached brainstem, were plated and studied using axonal tracing methods. In these cultures, we have shown that the normal anteroposterior topography of the olivocerebellar projection was acquired, even when the cerebellar lamella was detached from the brainstem and placed again in its original position. We also found that, following various experimental rotations of the anteroposterior axis of the cerebellum, the rostromedian olivary neurons still project to the posterior vermis and the caudolateral neurons to the anterior vermis, that now have inverted locations. Thus, the rotation of the target region results in the rotation of the projection. In addition, we have shown that the formation of the projection map could be due to the inability of rostromedian inferior olivary axons to grow in the anterior cerebellum. All these experiments strongly indicate that olivocerebellar fibers recognize within their target region polarity cues that organize their anteroposterior topography, and we suggest that Purkinje cells might carry these cues.


1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 2736-2752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yair Manor ◽  
John Rinzel ◽  
Idan Segev ◽  
Yosef Yarom

Manor, Yair, John Rinzel, Idan Segev, and Yosef Yarom. Low-amplitude oscillations in the inferior olive: a model based on electrical coupling of neurons with heterogeneous channel densities. J. Neurophysiol. 77: 2736–2752, 1997. The mechanism underlying subthreshold oscillations in inferior olivary cells is not known. To study this question, we developed a single-compartment, two-variable, Hodgkin-Huxley-like model for inferior olive neurons. The model consists of a leakage current and a low-threshold calcium current, whose kinetics were experimentally measured in slices. Depending on the maximal calcium and leak conductances, we found that a neuron model's response to current injection could be of four qualitatively different types: always stable, spontaneously oscillating, oscillating with injection of current, and bistable with injection of current. By the use of phase plane techniques, numerical integration, and bifurcation analysis, we subdivided the two-parameter space of channel densities into four regions corresponding to these behavioral types. We further developed, with the use of such techniques, an empirical rule of thumb that characterizes whether two cells when coupled electrically can generate sustained, synchronized oscillations like those observed in inferior olivary cells in slices, of low amplitude (0.1–10 mV) in the frequency range 4–10 Hz. We found that it is not necessary for either cell to be a spontaneous oscillator to obtain a sustained oscillation. On the other hand, two spontaneous oscillators always form an oscillating network when electrically coupled with any arbitrary coupling conductance. In the case of an oscillating pair of electrically coupled nonidentical cells, the coupling current varies periodically and is nonzero even for very large coupling values. The coupling current acts as an equalizing current to reconcile the differences between the two cells' ionic currents. It transiently depolarizes one cell and/or hyperpolarizes the other cell to obtain the regenerative response(s) required for the synchronized oscillation. We suggest that the subthreshold oscillations observed in the inferior olive can emerge from the electrical coupling between neurons with different channel densities, even if the inferior olive nucleus contains no or just a small proportion of spontaneously oscillating neurons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document