Refractory Anaemia Secondary to Small Bowel Angioectasias - Comparison between Endotherapy Alone versus Combination with Somatostatin Analogues

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Chetcuti Zammit ◽  
Reena Sidhu ◽  
David Sanders

Background & Aims: Patients with small bowel angioectasias (SBAs) can be difficult to manage as they are generally elderly with multiple co-morbidities. Angioectasias are multiple and tend to recur. Argon plasma coagulation (APC), despite being a commonly used method to treat these patients has an associated persistent rate of re-bleeding necessitating additional treatment to manage these patients.Methods: All patients with refractory iron deficiency anaemia secondary to SBAs were retrospectively subdivided into two groups. Patients in group 1 were managed with double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and APC alone and those in group 2 received Lanreotide in addition to DBE and APC.Results: A total of 49 patients were included in this study: group 1: 37 patients (75.5%), group 2: 12 patients (24.5%). All had significant comorbidities and the mean duration of anaemia was 114.3, SD 307.0 months. Significant improvements in haemoglobin (Hb) (11g/L vs 3.2g/L p=0.043), transfusion requirements per month (0.8 vs 4.7 p=0.052) and mean bleeding episodes (1.08 vs 2.6 p=0.032) were demonstrated in group 2 when compared to group 1. One patient developed symptomatic gallstone disease and one patient stopped Lanreotide due to a lack of response.Conclusions: This is the first study comparing endotherapy to a combination of endotherapy and pharmacotherapy. It shows a significantly better outcome in patients receiving a combination of endotherapy and Lanreotide. Lanreotide can be a safe additional treatment in patients not responding to APC alone.Abbreviations: APC: argon plasma coagulation; CE: capsule endoscopy; DBE double balloon enteroscopy; Hb: hemoglobin; OGIB: over gastrointestinal bleeding; SBAs: small bowel angioectasias.

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patarapong Kamalaporn ◽  
Sarah Cho ◽  
Nancy Basset ◽  
Maria Cirocco ◽  
Gary May ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the relative accuracy of capsule endoscopy (CE) versus double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) to investigate obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). CE is less invasive, but DBE more directly examines the small bowel, and allows tissue sampling plus therapeutic intervention.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the yield and outcome of DBE following CE in patients with obscure GIB.METHODS: After DBE became readily available at the Centre for Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology (St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario), all patients with obscure GIB seen from December 2002 to June 2007 were evaluated identically, first with CE, then with DBE (some with further interventions). Findings, adverse outcomes and interventions are reported.RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (25 women) with a mean (range) age of 64.1 years (34 to 83 years) are reported. Eight patients underwent DBE twice, for a total of 59 DBEs. Fourteen patients had overt GIB and the median (range) number of red blood cell unit transfusions was 10 (0 to 100). The positive findings for each type of lesion were compared in these 51 patients: angiodysplasia (CE 64.7% and DBE 61%, P=0.3), ulcers (CE 19.6% and DBE 18.6%, P=0.5), bleeding lesions (CE 43.1% and DBE 15.3%, P=0.0004) and mass (CE 10.2% and DBE 8.5%, P=0.5). DBE provided the advantage of therapeutic intervention: argon plasma coagulation (33 of 59 DBEs), clipping (two of 59), both argon plasma coagulation and clipping (three of 59), polypectomy (two of 59), tattooing (52 of 59) and biopsies (11 of 59). DBE detected lesions not seen by CE in 21 patients; lesions were treated in 18 patients. However, CE detected 31 lesions not seen by DBE. No major complications occurred with either examination.CONCLUSION: Overall detection rates for both techniques are similar. Each technique detected lesions not seen by the other. These data suggest that CE and DBE are complementary and that both evaluate obscure GIB more fully than either modality alone.


2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalton M. Chaves ◽  
Paulo Sakai ◽  
Cláudio V. Oliveira ◽  
Spencer Cheng ◽  
Shinichi Ishioka

BACKGROUND: Gastric antral vascular ectasia is a disorder whose pathogenetic mechanism is unknown. The endoscopic treatment with argon plasma coagulation has been considered one of the best endoscopic therapeutic options. AIM: To analyze the endoscopic and clinical features of gastric antral vascular ectasia and its response to the argon plasma coagulation treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients were studied and classified into two groups: group 1 - whose endoscopic aspect was striped (watermelon) or of the diffuse confluent type; group 2 - diffuse spotty nonconfluent endoscopic aspect. RESULTS: Group 1 with eight patients, all having autoimmune antibodies, but one, whose antibodies were not searched for. Three were cirrhotic and three had hypothyroidism. All had gastric mucosa atrophy. In group 2, with 10 patients, all had non-immune liver disease, with platelet levels below 90.000. Ten patients were submitted to argon plasma coagulation treatment, with 2 to 36 months of follow-up. Lesions recurred in all patients who remained in the follow-up program and one did not respond to treatment for acute bleeding control. CONCLUSION: There seem to be two distinct groups of patients with gastric antral vascular ectasia: one related to immunologic disorders and other to non-immune chronic liver disease and low platelets. The endoscopic treatment using argon plasma coagulation had a high recurrence in the long-term evaluation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document