scholarly journals 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome as a multidisciplinary problem

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-449
Author(s):  
Marta Skoczyńska ◽  
◽  
Izabela Lehman ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. e12523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Scarborough ◽  
Flavia Mueller ◽  
Ulrike Weber‐Stadlbauer ◽  
Juliet Richetto ◽  
Urs Meyer

Author(s):  
Maria Jalbrzikowski ◽  
Khwaja Hamzah Ahmed ◽  
Arati Patel ◽  
Rachel Jonas ◽  
Leila Kushan ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia B Solot ◽  
Carol Knightly ◽  
Steven D Handler ◽  
Marsha Gerdes ◽  
Donna M Mcdonald-Mcginn ◽  
...  

Scientifica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashutosh Halder ◽  
Manish Jain ◽  
Amanpreet Kaur Kalsi

The present study evaluated the role of SNP microarray in 101 cases of clinically suspected FISH negative (noninformative/normal) 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome. SNP microarray was carried out using 300 K HumanCytoSNP-12 BeadChip array or CytoScan 750 K array. SNP microarray identified 8 cases of 22q11.2 microdeletions and/or microduplications in addition to cases of chromosomal abnormalities and other pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs. Clinically suspected specific deletions (22q11.2) were detectable in approximately 8% of cases by SNP microarray, mostly from FISH noninformative cases. This study also identified several LOH/AOH loci with known and well-defined UPD (uniparental disomy) disorders. In conclusion, this study suggests more strict clinical criteria for FISH analysis. However, if clinical criteria are few or doubtful, in particular newborn/neonate in intensive care, SNP microarray should be the first screening test to be ordered. FISH is ideal test for detecting mosaicism, screening family members, and prenatal diagnosis in proven families.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 3991-4003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon RO. Nilsson ◽  
Kim Fejgin ◽  
Francois Gastambide ◽  
Miriam A. Vogt ◽  
Brianne A. Kent ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document