Hearing Thresholds in Newborns with a Cleft Palate Assessed by Auditory Brain Stem Response

2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narayanan Viswanathan ◽  
Michael Vidler ◽  
Bruce Richard

Objective: To objectively estimate the extent of hearing loss in infants with cleft palate and to measure the incidence of hearing loss. Design: Retrospective consecutive case note review. Setting: Tertiary institutional regional referral center for cleft lip and palate. Patients, Participants: Consecutive cases of 90 infants with cleft palate who underwent auditory brain stem response (ABR) threshold estimation. Interventions: ABR threshold estimation during natural sleep in infants with cleft palate under 2 months of age. Main Outcome Measures: Hearing level thresholds as estimated by auditory brain stem response and categorized as normal (< 25 ≤ 35 dB nHL), mild (> 35 ≤ 45 dB nHL), moderate (> 45 ≤ 65 dB nHL), severe (> 65 ≤ 90 dB nHL), and profound (> 90 dB nHL) hearing loss. Results: Hearing loss was present in 82% of the infants tested. Most of the hearing loss was conductive (89%), mild (86%), and bilateral (84%). Average age of ABR threshold estimation was 48.5 days. In 22% of infants there was an associated syndrome. The mean air conduction thresholds for the right and left ear were 40 and 39.7, respectively. Conclusion: The incidence of hearing loss in a cohort of cleft palate infants has been objectively estimated by auditory brain stem response thresholds and was found to be very high (82%).

1992 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teri A. Hamill ◽  
Ida Yañez ◽  
Curt E. Collier ◽  
John A. Lionbarger

1985 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Kishiko Sugiyama ◽  
Shigeru Inafuku ◽  
Isao Takimoto ◽  
Mikihiro Kihara ◽  
Akira Takahashi

1980 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese J. McGee ◽  
Jack D. Clemis

Auditory brain stem response (ABR) thresholds for tone pip stimuli were compared with audiometric thresholds for 63 ears to assess the feasibility of deriving audiograms with ABR techniques. Correlations between the two measures were highly significant, indicating a high degree of accuracy in assessing degree and configuration of hearing loss with ABR. Patients with conductive losses showed a simple one-to-one relationship between ABR and audiometric thresholds, while patients with cochlear losses did not. Possibly this is due to the effects of abnormal temporal integration or poor frequency selectivity in this latter group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document