scholarly journals Impact of misplaced subclavian vein catheter into jugular vein on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-qiao Yu ◽  
Yun Zhang ◽  
Shao-yang Zhang ◽  
Zhong-yan Liang ◽  
Shui-qiao Fu ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1377-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sushil P. Ambesh ◽  
Jyotish C. Pandey ◽  
Prakash K. Dubey

Background During subclavian vein catheterization, the most common misplacement of the catheter is cephalad, into the ipsilateral internal jugular vein (IJV). This can be detected by chest radiography. However, after any repositioning of the catheter, subsequent chest radiography is required. In an effort to simplify the detection of a misplaced subclavian vein catheter, the authors assessed a previously published detection method. Methods One hundred adult patients scheduled for subclavian vein cannulation were included in this study. After placement of subclavian vein catheter, chest radiography was performed. While the x-ray film was being processed, the authors performed an IJV occlusion test by applying external pressure on the IJV for approximately 10 s in the supraclavicular area and observed the change in central venous pressure and its waveform pattern. The observations thus obtained were compared with the position of catheter in chest radiographs, and the sensitivity and specificity of this method were evaluated using a 2 x 2 table. Results In 96 patients, subclavian vein cannulation was successfully performed. In four patients, cannulation was unsuccessful; therefore, these patients were excluded from the study. There were six misplacements of venous catheters as detected by radiography. In five (5.2%) patients, the catheter tip was located in the ipsilateral IJV, and in one (1.02%), the catheter tip was located in the contralateral subclavian vein. In the patients who had a misplaced catheter into the IJV, IJV occlusion test results were positive, with an increase of 3-5 mmHg in central venous pressure, whereas the test results were negative in patients who had normally placed catheters or misplacement of a catheter other than in the IJV. There were no false-positive or false-negative test results. Conclusion The IJV occlusion test successfully detects the misplacement of subclavian vein catheter into the IJV. However, it does not detect any other misplacement. The test may allow avoidance of repeated exposure to x-rays after catheter insertion and repositioning.


2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.P. Rath ◽  
P.K. Bithal ◽  
G.R. Toshniwal ◽  
H. Prabhakar ◽  
H.H. Dash

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunpeng Xing ◽  
Daxiang Wen ◽  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Jiemin Wang ◽  
Zhe Li ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriko Hattori ◽  
Hidenori Hattori ◽  
Kazushi Takahashi ◽  
Norihiro Suzuki ◽  
Kazuo Kishi

Catheter insertion for intravenous hyperalimentation is a commonly and widely used clinical technique. When compared with the incidence of complications associated with insertions into the internal jugular vein or the subclavian vein, complications associated with insertions into the femoral vein are less frequent. In this paper, we describe a very rare complication of femoral vein catheter insertion—namely, catheter displacement into the inferior epigastric vein.


2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Aggarwal ◽  
P. Hari ◽  
A. Bagga ◽  
S.N. Mehta

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Nagasawa ◽  
Tomoharu Shimizu ◽  
Hiromichi Sonoda ◽  
Eiji Mekata ◽  
Masato Wakabayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are generally used in oncology. Few studies have addressed complications associated with the insertion site. A total of 233 consecutive oncology patients were enrolled to receive TIAP inserts via internal jugular vein (IJV) or subclavian vein (SV). Data on clinicopathologic parameters and early/late complications were retrospectively collected. No differences were found early and late complication rates. Catheter injury was observed more frequently in the IJV group (2.9%) than in the SV group (1.0%) without statistical significance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, switch to palliative use of TIAP, and the distribution of diseases (low risk in patients with colorectal cancer) were independent risk factors for determining complications. In conclusion, TIAP insertion site showed no impact on the early and late complication rates. Catheter injury appears to occur at the same frequency with both approaches. Therefore, medical doctors may choose their preferred puncture site when performing TIAP insertion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document