Predicting level of improvement in Cogmed Working Memory Training for youth with ADHD

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Zwicker-Choate
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 769-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anil Chacko ◽  
Nicole Feirsen ◽  
Anne-Claude Bedard ◽  
David Marks ◽  
Jodi Z. Uderman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 108705472110664
Author(s):  
Salek (Sol) Sandberg ◽  
Tara McAuley

Objective: This study evaluated a modified working memory training program, Cogmed, for ADHD youth. Method: Forty youth were randomized to modified Cogmed training (MCT) or treatment as usual (CON). MCT was delivered in an outpatient mental health clinic in 3 weekly 35-minute sessions with a dedicated coach for 10 weeks. Participants completed assessments at baseline, after the intervention, and again 3 months later. Results: After controlling for baseline, groups were comparable on working memory, academics, and ADHD symptoms. The MCT group was rated by parents and teachers as having fewer executive function challenges and youth endorsed better self-concept compared with the CON group. Conclusions: MCT was associated with some improvement, which could not be attributed to increased working memory capacity and may reflect other facets of the program. Results question the usefulness of Cogmed but highlight considerations for optimizing adherence, engagement, and the therapeutic alliance in interventions for ADHD youth.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiina Salminen ◽  
Simone Kuhn ◽  
Torsten Schubert

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikaru Takeuchi ◽  
Yasuyuki Taki ◽  
Ryuta Kawashima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document