scholarly journals Vigilance for veterinary medicinal products: Reports of adverse reactions in the year 2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 158 (11) ◽  
pp. 743-747
Author(s):  
C Müntener ◽  
J Kupper ◽  
H Naegeli ◽  
B Gassner
Author(s):  
V. Naidoo ◽  
R. Sykes

The Veterinary Pharmacovigilance and Medicines Information Centre is responsible for the monitoring of veterinary adverse drug reactions in South Africa. An overview of reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received by the centre during the period March 2003 to February 2004 is given. A total of 20 reports was received. This had declined from the previous year. The general apathy with regards to the reporting of adverse drug reaction has prompted the Medicines Control Council to make reporting a legal obligation on all members of the veterinary and medical profession as from August 2004. The majority of reports involved suspected adverse reactions that occurred in dogs and cats. Most of the products implicated were Stock Remedies. Veterinarians predominantly administered these products. Only two reports were received from a veterinary pharmaceutical company.


2015 ◽  
Vol 157 (11) ◽  
pp. 601-605
Author(s):  
C R Müntener ◽  
J Kupper ◽  
H Naegeli ◽  
M Schäublin

Author(s):  
V. Naidoo ◽  
R. Sykes

The Veterinary Pharmacovigilance and Medicines Information Centre is responsible for the monitoring of veterinary adverse drug reactions in South Africa. An overview of reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received by the centre during the period March 2004 to February 2006 is presented. A total of 21 reports was received in the 2-year period, continuing the decline in the number of reports to a lower figure than in any previous year. This is surprising considering the legal obligation of the veterinary professionals to report all adverse drug reactions. Once again the majority of reports involved suspected adverse reactions that occurred in dogs and cats. Most of the products implicated were stock remedies. Veterinarians predominantly administered these products.


2017 ◽  
Vol 159 (11) ◽  
pp. 581-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
C R Müntener ◽  
C Müntener ◽  
J Kupper ◽  
H Naegeli ◽  
B Gassner

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-112
Author(s):  
C Müntener ◽  
J Kupper ◽  
H Naegeli ◽  
B Gassner

Author(s):  
V. Naidoo

The Veterinary Pharmacovigilance and Medicines Information Centre is responsible for the monitoring of veterinary adverse drug reactions in South Africa. An overview of reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received by the centre during the period March 2002 to February 2003 is given. In total, 40 reports were received. This had declined from the previous year. Most reports involved suspected adverse reactions that occurred in dogs and cats. Most of the products implicated were Stock Remedies. The animal owner predominantly administered these products. Only 1 report was received from a veterinary pharmaceutical company. Increasing numbers of reports are being received from veterinarians.


Author(s):  
V. Naidoo ◽  
R. Gehring

An overview of reports of suspected adverse drug reactions received by the Veterinary Pharmacovigilance and Medicines Information Centre during the period March 2001 to February 2002 is given. A total of 77 reports were received. The majority of reports involved suspected adverse reactions that occurred in dogs and cats. Most products implicated in the reports were Stock Remedies. The products were predominantly administered either by veterinarians or trained paraveterinary professionals. Although the majority of reports were received from veterinary pharmaceutical companies, the proportion of reports received directly from veterinarians increased compared with previous years.


One Health ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100237
Author(s):  
K.L. Mahefarisoa ◽  
N. Simon Delso ◽  
V. Zaninotto ◽  
M.E. Colin ◽  
J.M. Bonmatin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document