A-Comparative evaluation of root surface roughness after the use of gracey curettes and piezo-surgery-driven root planning tip on root surface: An in-vitro study

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Kiran Suradkar ◽  
Amit Chaudhari ◽  
Amita M Mali ◽  
Yogesh Khadtare ◽  
Prakash Vhatkar
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Khushboo Goyal ◽  
SuparnaGanguly Saha ◽  
Anuj Bhardwaj ◽  
MainakKanti Saha ◽  
Kaustubh Bhapkar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyothi Nagesh ◽  
Amith Setty ◽  
JayashankaraChatra Marigowda ◽  
Anilkumar Shivanna ◽  
SharathKumar Paluvary ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosane F. Z. Lizarelli ◽  
Zulene A. Ferreira ◽  
Tatiana M. Torquato ◽  
Jose E. C. Sampaio ◽  
Vanderlei S. Bagnato

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nur Ayman Abdul Hayei ◽  
Noor Azlin Yahya ◽  
Syarida Hasnur Safii ◽  
Roslan Saub ◽  
Rathna Devi Vaithilingam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The influence of scaler tip design on root surface roughness, tooth substance loss and patients’ pain perception is investigated. Methods This article was divided into the following parts: Part 1 Surface roughness and substance loss: an in vitro study, which involves intact extracted teeth sectioned and treated using a piezoelectric ultrasonic device (PM200 EMS Piezon, Switzerland) with a conventional scaler tip (FS-407) and a Perio Slim (PS) scaler tip (Perio Slim DS-016A). All sectioned samples for tooth surface roughness (n = 20) and tooth substance loss (n = 46) analyses were measured and compared using a 3D surface texture analyser and scanning electron microscope (SEM) respectively, at baseline and following scaling. Part 2 Pain Perception: a clinical study, which was a split mouth study design including 30 participants with gingivitis and/or mild chronic periodontitis; treated with supra-gingival scaling from teeth #13 to #23. Subjects were randomised to group A or group B. Group A was treated first with PS scaler tips, whereas group B was treated first with conventional scaler tips. Pain perception was recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Results In vitro study: both scaler tips caused significant reduction in root substance roughness after scaling (p < 0.05), but no significant difference between the two scaler tips (p > 0.05) was observed. The PS scaler tip caused statistically significantly less root substance loss (p < 0.05) when the initial thickness of the tooth was < 1000 µm. Clinical study: the participants reported significantly lesser pain score during scaling using the PS scaler tip (median: 3) than when using the conventional scaler tip (median: 5) (p < 0.05). Conclusions In the in vitro study, using a slim scaler tip design causes less tooth substance loss compared to a wider scaler tip design. In the clinical study, less pain was observed compared than a wide (conventional) scaler tip design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document