scholarly journals EFFECT OF REINFORCEMENT DURATION ON FIXED-INTERVAL RESPONDING1

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. R. Staddon
1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Nelson ◽  
Frank M. Lassman ◽  
Richard L. Hoel

Averaged auditory evoked responses to 1000-Hz 20-msec tone bursts were obtained from normal-hearing adults under two different intersignal interval schedules: (1) a fixed-interval schedule with 2-sec intersignal intervals, and (2) a variable-interval schedule of intersignal intervals ranging randomly from 1.0 sec to 4.5 sec with a mean of 2 sec. Peak-to-peak amplitudes (N 1 — P 2 ) as well as latencies of components P 1 , N 1 , P 2 , and N 2 were compared under the two different conditions of intersignal interval. No consistent or significant differences between variable- and fixed-interval schedules were found in the averaged responses to signals of either 20 dB SL or 50 dB SL. Neither were there significant schedule differences when 35 or 70 epochs were averaged per response. There were, however, significant effects due to signal amplitude and to the number of epochs averaged per response. Response amplitude increased and response latency decreased with sensation level of the tone burst.


1972 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Gottheil ◽  
Lacey O. Corbett ◽  
Joseph C. Grasberger ◽  
Floyd S. Cornelison

1983 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. David Gentry ◽  
Bernard Weiss ◽  
Victor G. Laties
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document