approximation algorithms
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2269
(FIVE YEARS 271)

H-INDEX

81
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Sai Ji ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
Zijun Wu ◽  
Yicheng Xu

In this paper, we propose a so-called capacitated min–max correlation clustering model, a natural variant of the min–max correlation clustering problem. As our main contribution, we present an integer programming and its integrality gap analysis for the proposed model. Furthermore, we provide two approximation algorithms for the model, one of which is a bi-criteria approximation algorithm and the other is based on LP-rounding technique.


2022 ◽  
pp. 2641-2663
Author(s):  
Hossein Esfandiari ◽  
Vahab Mirrokni ◽  
Shyam Narayanan

2021 ◽  
Vol 127 (25) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anurag Anshu ◽  
David Gosset ◽  
Karen J. Morenz Korol ◽  
Mehdi Soleimanifar

Algorithms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Priyanka Mukhopadhyay

In this work, we give provable sieving algorithms for the Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) and the Closest Vector Problem (CVP) on lattices in ℓp norm (1≤p≤∞). The running time we obtain is better than existing provable sieving algorithms. We give a new linear sieving procedure that works for all ℓp norm (1≤p≤∞). The main idea is to divide the space into hypercubes such that each vector can be mapped efficiently to a sub-region. We achieve a time complexity of 22.751n+o(n), which is much less than the 23.849n+o(n) complexity of the previous best algorithm. We also introduce a mixed sieving procedure, where a point is mapped to a hypercube within a ball and then a quadratic sieve is performed within each hypercube. This improves the running time, especially in the ℓ2 norm, where we achieve a time complexity of 22.25n+o(n), while the List Sieve Birthday algorithm has a running time of 22.465n+o(n). We adopt our sieving techniques to approximation algorithms for SVP and CVP in ℓp norm (1≤p≤∞) and show that our algorithm has a running time of 22.001n+o(n), while previous algorithms have a time complexity of 23.169n+o(n).


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imo Kalu Agwu ◽  
Donatus Ikechi Igbokwe

We present new fixed points algorithms called multistep H-iterative scheme and multistep SH-iterative scheme. Under certain contractive-type condition, convergence and stability results were established without any imposition of the ’sum conditions’, which to a large extent make some existing iterative schemes so far studied by other authors in this direction practically inefficient. Our results complement and improve some recent results in literature.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2259
Author(s):  
Ana Klobučar ◽  
Robert Manger

The maximum weighted independent set (MWIS) problem is important since it occurs in various applications, such as facility location, selection of non-overlapping time slots, labeling of digital maps, etc. However, in real-life situations, input parameters within those models are often loosely defined or subject to change. For such reasons, this paper studies robust variants of the MWIS problem. The study is restricted to cases where the involved graph is a tree. Uncertainty of vertex weights is represented by intervals. First, it is observed that the max–min variant of the problem can be solved in linear time. Next, as the most important original contribution, it is proved that the min–max regret variant is NP-hard. Finally, two mutually related approximation algorithms for the min–max regret variant are proposed. The first of them is already known, but adjusted to the considered situation, while the second one is completely new. Both algorithms are analyzed and evaluated experimentally.


Author(s):  
Zhicheng Liu ◽  
Hong Chang ◽  
Ran Ma ◽  
Donglei Du ◽  
Xiaoyan Zhang

Abstract We consider a two-stage submodular maximization problem subject to a cardinality constraint and k matroid constraints, where the objective function is the expected difference of a nonnegative monotone submodular function and a nonnegative monotone modular function. We give two bi-factor approximation algorithms for this problem. The first is a deterministic $\left( {{1 \over {k + 1}}\left( {1 - {1 \over {{e^{k + 1}}}}} \right),1} \right)$ -approximation algorithm, and the second is a randomized $\left( {{1 \over {k + 1}}\left( {1 - {1 \over {{e^{k + 1}}}}} \right) - \varepsilon ,1} \right)$ -approximation algorithm with improved time efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document