scholarly journals Comparison of functional and volumetric increase of the future remnant liver and postoperative outcomes after portal vein embolization and complete or partial associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 436-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadi Rassam ◽  
Pim B. Olthof ◽  
Krijn P. van Lienden ◽  
Roel J. Bennink ◽  
Joris I. Erdmann ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Klaus STEINBRÜCK ◽  
Jefferson ALVES ◽  
Reinaldo FERNANDES ◽  
Marcelo ENNE ◽  
Lúcio Filgueiras PACHECO-MOREIRA

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization is an accepted procedure that provides hypertrophy of the future remnant liver in order to reduce post-hepatectomy complications. AIM: To present a series submitted to portal vein embolization using an adapted hysterosalpingography catheter via transileocolic route. METHODS: Were performed right portal branch embolization in 19 patients using hysterosalpingography catheter. For embolizing the vessel, was used Gelfoam(r) powder with absolute alcohol solution. Indications for hepatectomy were colorectal liver metastases in all cases. RESULTS: An adequate growth of the future remnant liver was achieved in 15 patients (78.9%) and second time hepatectomy could be done in 14 (73.7%). In one patient (5.2%), tumor progression prevented surgery. One patient presented acute renal failure after portal embolization. CONCLUSIONS: The hysterosalpingography catheter is easy to handle and can be introduced into the portal vein with a wire guide. There were no major post-embolization complication. Its use is safe, cheap and effective.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2081-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry de Baere ◽  
Christophe Teriitehau ◽  
Frederic Deschamps ◽  
Laurence Catherine ◽  
Pramod Rao ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanyu Zhou ◽  
Yuxiao Xia ◽  
Zehua Lei

Abstract Background: This study evaluated the feasibility, safety and effectiveness in patients treated with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and portal vein embolization (PVE) for the treatment of liver malignant tumors with insufficient future liver remnant (FIR). Method: We performed a computer search on the PubMed databases to retrieve the RCT or clinical trials comparing ALPPS and PVE published from January 2010 to January 2020. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two researchers independently. The RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0 software were used to extract and analyze the data. Result: A total of 11 retroprospective clinical trial articles comprising 867 patients were included in the study. The number of patients who underwent ALPPS were 247 and 620 for PVE. There were significant differences (P <0.05) in the second stage hepatectomy[OR=11.25, 95%CI: 5.64~22.43, Z=6.87, P<0.001], the sufficient FLR growth[MD=46.85, 95% CI:4~89.70, Z=2.41, P=0.03], the time to stage II operation (MD=-22.85, 95% CI:-33.87~-11.84, Z=4.07, P<0.001) and rate of R0 resection[OR=2.29, 95%CI: 1.07~4.90, Z=2.13, P=0.03]between the two groups. However, no significant differences were observed between ALPPS and PVE in terms of mortality within 90 days of perioperative period, overall postoperative complication rate, incidence of postoperative liver failure and postoperative hospital stay (P>0. 05). Conclusion: Compared with PVE, The ALPPS procedure was associated with good postoperative outcomes with insufficient FLR. However, the clinical application of ALPPS and PVE has some limitations. Large, multicenter prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1251-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Geisel ◽  
Maciej Malinowski ◽  
Maciej-Janusz Powerski ◽  
Joost Wüstefeld ◽  
Victoria Heller ◽  
...  

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S46-S47
Author(s):  
M. Couto ◽  
F. Gianonne ◽  
B. Guiu ◽  
F. Navarro ◽  
F. Panaro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document