scholarly journals Intubation during A Medevac Flight: Safety and Effect on The Total Prehospital Time in Helicopter Emergency Medical Service System

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Maeyama ◽  
Hiromichi Naito ◽  
Francis X Guyette ◽  
Takashi Yorifuji ◽  
Yuki Banshotani ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Endotracheal intubation is an essential skill in emergency medicine requiring technical proficiency and sufficient preparation for a safe procedure. In the Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS), it is common to intubate the patient who needs an advanced airway prior to take-off. In-flight-intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to environmental limitations of space, communication, and vibration. In contrast, IFI may shorten the total prehospital time since the procedure is conducted during the flight. We tested whether IFI can be performed safely and shorten transportation time. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study with patients transported from Apr 2010 to Mar 2017 in a single center. We included patients ≥ 18 years who received prehospital intubation and excluded patients with emergent intubation at the scene. We divided the observational cohort into two groups. The Flight group (FG): included patients intubated during the flight. The Ground group (GG): included patients intubated prior to take-off. HEMS crews transported both groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of successful intubations. Secondary outcomes included total prehospital time and the incidence of complications such as hypoxia and hypotension. Result: We analyzed 376 patients during the study period. There were 192 cases in FG and 184 cases in GG. Intubation success rate did not differ between the two groups (FG vs GG: 98.4% vs 97.3%, p = 0.50). There were no differences in hypoxia (FG vs GG: 3.4% vs 4.2%, p = 1.00) or hypotension (FG vs GG: 5.1% vs 5.3%, p = 1.00) between two groups. Scene time was shorter in FG (FG vs GG: 7 min vs 14 min, p < 0.001), as was total prehospital time (FG vs GG: 33.5 min vs 40.0 min, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In-flight-intubation during HEMS could be safely performed without additional hypoxia or hypotension. In-flight-intubation by experienced providers shortened transportation time by an average of 7 minutes.

Author(s):  
Hiroki Maeyama ◽  
Hiromichi Naito ◽  
Francis X. Guyette ◽  
Takashi Yorifuji ◽  
Yuki Banshotani ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) commonly intubates patients who require advanced airway support prior to takeoff. In-flight intubation (IFI) is avoided because it is considered difficult due to limited space, difficulty communicating, and vibration in flight. However, IFI may shorten the total prehospital time. We tested whether IFI can be performed safely by the HEMS. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adult patients transported from 2010 to 2017 who received prehospital, non-emergent intubation from a single HEMS. We divided the cohort in two groups, patients intubated during flight (flight group, FG) and patients intubated before takeoff (ground group, GG). The primary outcome was the proportion of successful intubations. Secondary outcomes included total prehospital time and the incidence of complications. Results We analyzed 376 patients transported during the study period, 192 patients in the FG and 184 patients in the GG. The intubation success rate did not differ between the two groups (FG 189/192 [98.4%] vs. GG 179/184 [97.3%], p = 0.50). There were also no differences in hypoxia (FG 4/117 [3.4%] vs. GG 4/95 [4.2%], p = 1.00) or hypotension (FG 6/117 [5.1%] vs. GG 5/95 [5.3%], p = 1.00) between the two groups. Scene time and total prehospital time were shorter in the FG (scene time 7 min vs. 14 min, p <  0.001; total prehospital time 33.5 min vs. 40.0 min, p <  0.001). Conclusions IFI was safely performed with high success rates, similar to intubation on the ground, without increasing the risk of hypoxia or hypotension. IFI by experienced providers shortened transportation time, which may improve patient outcomes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 132-137
Author(s):  
John W. Hafner ◽  
Blake W. Perkins ◽  
Joshua D. Korosac ◽  
Alayna K. Bucher ◽  
Jean C. Aldag ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minhai Zhang ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
Lin Shi ◽  
Fangmin Ge ◽  
Hang Yu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To explore the feasibility and advantage of using multi-rotor drones in a county emergency medical service system.Methods: This study was conducted in Changxing County, Zhejiang Province from January to September 2018. We applied drones to simulate the transfer of first aid materials from health centers to the Changxing County People's Hospital. A total of 3 indicators were obtained: (1) The flight time of the drone; (2) The estimated time of ambulance dispatched from the county hospital was measured by Baidu map, Amap and Tencent map software; (3) The road transportation time measured by Amap software at 0: 00, 8: 00, 10:00, 12:00, 14:00, 16:00, 18:00, 20:00.Results: A total of 10 health centers were included in this study. Linear distance from county people's hospital to these centers was (10.97±3.59) km, and the road distance was (13.61±4.95) km. (2) The flight time of drones were (16.35±5.15) min, less than road transportation time measured by Amap, Baidu, and Tencent map software, which was (21.40±5.15) min, (22.50±6.11) min, (22.00±5.23) min, respectively (P<0.01). The road transportation time measured using Amap software was longer than that of drones from 0:00 to 20:00 (P<0.01), with the maximum time of (27.80±6.12) min at 18:00, and the minimum time of (21.40±5.15) min at midnight. Drones could save up to 14.07 min at most and 2.8min at least, with an average save of (7.98±1.32) min.Conclusions: Drone was faster than road transportation to transfer first aid medical supplies within a county. Further researches are needed to integrate drone into emergency medical service system.


Resuscitation ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 1270-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisashi Matsumoto ◽  
Kunihiro Mashiko ◽  
Yoshiaki Hara ◽  
Noriyoshi Kutsukata ◽  
Yuichiro Sakamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document