Porting Pan I to Allegro COMMON LISP

1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darrin J. Lane
Keyword(s):  
Common Lisp

The embeddable Common Lisp

1995 ◽  
Vol VIII (1) ◽  
pp. 30-41
Author(s):  
Guiseppe Attardi
Keyword(s):  
Common Lisp

A guided tour of the Common Lisp interface manager

1990 ◽  
Vol IV (1) ◽  
pp. 17-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramana Rao ◽  
William M. York ◽  
Dennis Doughty
Keyword(s):  
Common Lisp ◽  
The Common ◽  
Guided Tour

A prototype of an interface builder for the Common Lisp Interface Manager—CLIB

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Jan Hesse ◽  
Rainer König ◽  
Filippo Logi ◽  
Jens Herder
Keyword(s):  
Common Lisp ◽  
The Common

Building common Lisp applications with reasonable performance

1993 ◽  
Vol VI (3) ◽  
pp. 20-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Boreczky
Keyword(s):  
Common Lisp

scholarly journals How to Implement Lightweight Threads

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauricio Toro
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Efficient Implementation ◽  
High Order ◽  
Common Lisp ◽  
Event Driven ◽  
Lightweight Threads ◽  
Concurrent Constraint Programming

Using continuations in high order languages such as Common Lisp is notvery efficient because they do not work close to the compiler . Other optionssuch as making an scheduler in C can be efficient when the sources of theinterpreter are available and they can be modified, otherwise, making aninterface with C using FFI causes an overhead, making it impossible toachive “lighweight”.To make an efficient implementation of lighweight threads in CommonLisp it is required to analyze the type of applications which will use thethreads. For example, for a Concurrent Constraint Programming (CCP)interpreter using Gecode, event driven programming seams very natural,but for the Omax system, it is not be appropriate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document