scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Conservative Management Vs Lord’s Anal Dilatation Vs Lateral Sphincterotomy in the Treatment for Chronic Anal Fissure

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanaa Abdul Kader ◽  
Reina Khadilkar ◽  
Priti Shah ◽  
Maitreyee Save ◽  
Inturi Ram Teja
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Anal Dilatation ◽  
Lateral Sphincterotomy

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Lateral Sphincterotomy versus Local 2 % Diltiazem Ointment for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Dr Shib Shankar Kuiri ◽  
◽  
Dr. Ashis Kumar Saha ◽  
Dr Goutam Ghosh ◽  
Dr Nilay Mandal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Lateral Sphincterotomy

scholarly journals The Chronic Anal Fissure Treatment by Internal Partial Lateral Sphincterotomy and Following Anal Manometry

1997 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Dušan Šimkovič ◽  
Milan Široký ◽  
Karel Šmejkal
Keyword(s):  
Anal Fissure ◽  
Anorectal Manometry ◽  
Anal Manometry ◽  
Chronic Anal Fissure ◽  
Lateral Sphincterotomy ◽  
Internal Sphincterotomy ◽  
The People ◽  
Pathologic Findings ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Careful History

Anal fissure remains one of the most common proctologic problems. A number of reports have advocated the use of partial internal sphincterotomy as a treatment of chronic anal fissure. Our study shows the results of a retrospective analysis of our patients who underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure. To determine long time results we examined random sample of 75 operated patients. Apart from taking careful history and patientÕs assessment of the operation effect, the patients were investigated ãper rectumÒ, and even possibly rectoscopically. To asscertain suitability and also security of properly done internal sphincterotomy, we performed anorectal manometric examinations in 53 patients controlled. To conclude our results, we can state that in 9 (12%) patients controlled some subjective complaints or certain pathologic findings connected with anal fissure or sphincterotomy were found. None of the people from the set of ours suffered from any complaints, which can be taken as stool incontinency. In no patients any change in pressure measured by anorectal manometry indicating incontinency was proved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document