scholarly journals Risk, Ambiguity, and the Separation of Utility and Beliefs

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Ghirardato ◽  
Massimo Marinacci
Keyword(s):  
Risk Ambiguity

scholarly journals Risk, ambiguity, and sovereign rating

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-57
Author(s):  
Paolo Di Caro
Keyword(s):  
Risk Ambiguity

Risk, ambiguity, and equity premium: International evidence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eung-Bin Kim ◽  
Suk-Joon Byun
Keyword(s):  
Equity Premium ◽  
International Evidence ◽  
Risk Ambiguity

Risk, ambiguity, and information use in an ethical decision dilemma

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen L. Mosier ◽  
Michael Bartholomew ◽  
Eva Meng ◽  
Luiz Xavier
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Decision ◽  
Information Use ◽  
Risk Ambiguity

Robust Consumption-Investment With Return Ambiguity: A Dual Approach With Risk Ambiguity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyunghyun Park ◽  
Hoi Ying Wong
Keyword(s):  
Dual Approach ◽  
Risk Ambiguity

Risk, Ambiguity and Decision

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ellsberg
Keyword(s):  
Risk Ambiguity

scholarly journals Risk, ambiguity, and state-preference theory

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 437-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Nau
Keyword(s):  
Preference Theory ◽  
State Preference ◽  
Risk Ambiguity

scholarly journals Risk, Ambiguity, and the Rank-Dependence Axioms

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J Machina
Keyword(s):  
Expected Utility ◽  
Subjective Expected Utility ◽  
Choquet Expected Utility ◽  
Risk Ambiguity ◽  
Rank Dependence ◽  
Nonseparable Models ◽  
Utility Preferences

Choice problems in the spirit of Ellsberg (1961) suggest that rank-dependent (“Choquet expected utility”) preferences over subjective gambles might be subject to the same difficulties that Ellsberg's earlier examples posed for subjective expected utility. These difficulties stem from event-separability properties that rank-dependent preferences partially retain from expected utility, and suggest that nonseparable models of preferences might be better at capturing features of behavior that lead to these paradoxes. (JEL D81)

[Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms]:Reply

1963 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ellsberg
Keyword(s):  
Risk Ambiguity ◽  
Savage Axioms
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document