scholarly journals The Dynamics of Adjustable-Rate Subprime Mortgage Default A Structural Estimation

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanming Fang ◽  
You Suk Kim ◽  
Wenli Li
Author(s):  
James B. Kau ◽  
Donald C. Keenan ◽  
Constantine Lyubimov ◽  
V. Carlos Slawson

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xudong An ◽  
A. Quang Do ◽  
Timothy J. Riddiough ◽  
Vincent W. Yao

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenli Li ◽  
Michelle J White ◽  
Ning Zhu

Homeowners in financial distress can use bankruptcy to avoid defaulting on their mortgages, since filing loosens their budget constraints. But the 2005 bankruptcy reform made bankruptcy less favorable to homeowners and therefore caused mortgage defaults to rise. We test this relationship and find that the reform caused prime and subprime mortgage default rates to rise by 23% and 14%, respectively. Default rates rose even more for homeowners who were particularly negatively affected by the reform. We calculate that bankruptcy reform caused mortgage default rates to rise by one percentage point even before the start of the financial crisis. (JEL D14, G01, G21, K35)


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bajari ◽  
Chenghuan Sean Chu ◽  
Denis Nekipelov ◽  
Minjung Park

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 75-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Kau ◽  
Donald C. Keenan ◽  
Constantine Lyubimov ◽  
V. Carlos Slawson

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Jones ◽  
G. Stacy Sirmans

Author(s):  
Robert A. Connolly ◽  
Lynn M. Fisher ◽  
Gary Painter

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 167-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Fuster ◽  
Paul S. Willen

This paper studies the treatment effect of monthly payment size on mortgage default, using a sample of adjustable-rate loans that experienced large payment reductions thanks to the recent low interest rate environment. Payment size has an economically large effect on repayment behavior; for instance, cutting the required payment in half reduces the delinquency hazard by about 55 percent. Importantly, the link between payment size and delinquency is equally strong for borrowers that are significantly underwater on their mortgage. Relying on payment reductions for identification circumvents the selection concerns due to prepayments that would be associated with rate increases. (JEL D14, G21, R31)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document