scholarly journals Money Market Funds in Europe and Financial Stability

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Ansidei ◽  
Elias Bengtsson ◽  
Daniele Frison ◽  
Giles Ward
2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-39
Author(s):  
Jack Murphy ◽  
Stephen Cohen ◽  
Brenden Carroll ◽  
Aline A. Smith ◽  
Matthew Virag ◽  
...  

Purpose – To explain the background and details and to discuss the implications of the USA Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) July 23, 2014 amendments to Rule 2a-7 and other rules that govern money market funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Design/methodology/approach – Explains the background, including problems during the financial crisis, the USA Treasury’s temporary guarantee program in 2008, earlier SEC proposals, and the USA Financial Stability Oversight Council’s recommendations. Details the amendments to Rule 2a-7, including the authorization to impose liquidity fees and redemption gates, the floating net asset value (NAV) requirement, the impact of the amendments on unregistered money funds operating under Rule 12d1-1, guidance on fund valuation methods, disclosure requirements, requirements for money fund portfolios to be diversified as to issuers of securities and guarantors, stress testing requirements, and compliance dates. Findings – The Amendments set forth sweeping changes to money fund regulation and will have a profound effect on the money fund industry. Although the most significant provisions of the Amendments – the floating NAV requirement and the imposition of liquidity fees and redemption gates – will not go into effect for two years, the changes to the industry will be apparent almost immediately. Practical implications – Money fund managers and boards of directors should begin assessing the potential impact of the Amendments and develop a schedule to come into compliance. Originality/value – Practical guidance from experienced financial services lawyers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 187
Author(s):  
Larry G. Locke ◽  
Ethan Mitra ◽  
Virginia Locke

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">The money market mutual fund industry is experiencing a sea change.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Thanks, in large part, to their role in the 2008 market break, U.S. securities regulators have targeted money market funds for a structural overhaul.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Runs on money market funds by institutional investors in the wake of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy weakened the short-term credit market to the point of collapse.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The resulting intervention of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury may have saved the economy from further damage but came at such a perceived cost that legislation now forbids it.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) believe restructuring is necessary.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Their only question appears to be exactly what form the product will take.</span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;"> </span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">One of the elements being considered in the reform effort will be increased disclosure of money market fund shadow prices.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The regulators have posited that more frequent and more available disclosure of fund shadow prices will lead to more discipline being exerted on the fund industry, especially by the institutional market.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A revamped disclosure regime, however, has been in effect since monthly shadow price disclosures were imposed by the SEC in December 2010.</span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;"> </span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; line-height: normal; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: black; font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-themecolor: text1;">This study looks at the impact of those 2010 disclosure regulations on different sectors of the market.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It seeks to identify a correlation between shadow prices and changes in assets for both retail and institutional funds.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The authors assess the findings of the study and discuss the implications of those findings for the impending regulatory restructuring.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document