Hedge Funds: An Alternative Test of Manager Skill

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Barry
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 63-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arik Ben Dor ◽  
Jingling Guan ◽  
Xiaming Zeng

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Jiang ◽  
Bing Liang ◽  
Huacheng Zhang

Using a novel style identification procedure, we show that style-shifting is a dynamic strategy commonly used by hedge fund managers. Three quarters of hedge funds shifted their investment styles at least once over the period from January 1994 to December 2013. We perform empirical tests of two hypotheses for the motivations of hedge fund style-shifting, namely backward-looking and forward-looking hypotheses. We find no evidence that style-shifting funds are backward-looking. Instead, we show evidence that managers of style-shifting funds exhibit both style-timing ability and the skill of generating abnormal returns in new styles. The new styles that hedge funds shift to on average outperform their old styles by 0.76% and style-shifting funds on average outperform their new style benchmark by 1.10% over the subsequent 12-month horizon. Finally, we show that small funds, winner funds, and funds with net inflows are more likely to shift styles. This paper was accepted by David Simchi-Levi, finance.


2003 ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
O. Khmyz

Acording to the author's opinion, institutional investors (from many participants of the capital market) play the main role, especially investment funds. They supply to small-sized investors special investment services, which allow them to participate in the investment process. However excessive institutialization and increasing number of hedge-funds may lead to financial crisis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (11) ◽  
pp. 914-922
Author(s):  
Masashi Kotari ◽  
Tomo Tadokoro ◽  
Shin-ichi Tanaka ◽  
Mikimasa Iwata

1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-109
Author(s):  
Rohmad Qomari

To carry out evaluation comprehensively, we need appropriate instrument that suitable with domain that being evaluated. Evaluation instrument development with test has been conducted by experts. These instruments were only suitable to measure cognitive domain and part of psychomotor domain. To measure affective domain, we need to develop non-test evaluation instrument (alternative test). The development of this instrument tends to more difficult and complicated compare with instrument test evaluation instrument. Therefore, it does necessitate a through study to derive and elaborate affective domain to specific aspect to develop valid and reliable instrument.


1996 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Vickers ◽  
Charles Pearce

Trail-making tests such as Oswald and Roth's 1987 Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test offer sensitive and reliable indicators of cognitive efficiency that are also simple, inexpensive, and quick to administer. A disadvantage is that there exist only a limited number of test forms so the scope for repeated administration and systematic investigation is restricted. The basic reason is that the principled generation of such pathways remains an unsolved analytical problem. In this note we propose an heuristic stratagem for the generation of alternative test forms for the Zahlen-Verbindungs-Test.


CFA Magazine ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
Stephen Brown
Keyword(s):  

CFA Digest ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-78
Author(s):  
David B. Miyazaki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document