scholarly journals ELEVATE: an innovative study design to assess the efficacy, safety, and evolution of cardiovascular parameters in de novo kidney transplant recipients after early conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus

Author(s):  
Markus van der Giet ◽  
Josep Cruzado ◽  
Johan de Fijter ◽  
Hallvard Holdaas ◽  
Zailong Wang ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1979-1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Pascual ◽  
Stefan P. Berger ◽  
Oliver Witzke ◽  
Helio Tedesco ◽  
Shamkant Mulgaonkar ◽  
...  

Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, −1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, −1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.


2018 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. S367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Pascual ◽  
Steve Chadban ◽  
Helio Tedesco ◽  
Stefan Berger ◽  
Yasir Qazi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders ??sberg ◽  
Karsten Midtvedt ◽  
P??l D. Line ◽  
Janicke Narverud ◽  
Hallvard Holdaas ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aziza Ajlan ◽  
Hassan Aleid ◽  
Tariq Zulfiquar Ali ◽  
Hala Joharji ◽  
Khalid Almeshari ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Induction therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first-line agent in low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients. However, the role of IL2-RA in the setting of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression has not been fully investigated. Aims To compare different induction therapeutic strategies with 2 doses of basiliximab vs. no induction in low immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients as per KFSHRC protocol. Methods Prospective, randomized, double blind, non-inferiority, controlled clinical trial Expected outcomes 1. Primary outcomes: Biopsy-proven acute rejection within first year following transplant 2. Secondary outcomes: a. Patient and graft survival at 1 year b. eGFR at 6 months and at 12 months c. Emergence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) Trial registration The study has been prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NTC: 04404127). Registered on 27 May 2020.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document