scholarly journals State-of-the-art review of geothermal reservoir modelling

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F. Pinder
2010 ◽  
Vol 181 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vogt ◽  
D. Mottaghy ◽  
A. Wolf ◽  
V. Rath ◽  
R. Pechnig ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Karrech ◽  
Oussama Beltaief ◽  
Ruyan Vincec ◽  
Thomas Poulet ◽  
Klaus Regenauer-Lieb

Geothermics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 146-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C. Pearson-Grant ◽  
P. Franz ◽  
J. Clearwater

Geothermics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 102089
Author(s):  
P. Salinas ◽  
G. Regnier ◽  
C. Jacquemyn ◽  
C.C. Pain ◽  
M.D. Jackson

1975 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-126
Author(s):  
Patrick K. Takahashi ◽  
Bill H. Chen ◽  
Ken I. Mashima ◽  
Arthur S. Seki

Geothermics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 395-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. O'Sullivan ◽  
Karsten Pruess ◽  
Marcelo J. Lippmann

Author(s):  
T. A. Welton

Various authors have emphasized the spatial information resident in an electron micrograph taken with adequately coherent radiation. In view of the completion of at least one such instrument, this opportunity is taken to summarize the state of the art of processing such micrographs. We use the usual symbols for the aberration coefficients, and supplement these with £ and 6 for the transverse coherence length and the fractional energy spread respectively. He also assume a weak, biologically interesting sample, with principal interest lying in the molecular skeleton remaining after obvious hydrogen loss and other radiation damage has occurred.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document