Computer-aided Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms of Interval Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shantanu Banik ◽  
Rangaraj M. Rangayyan ◽  
J.E. Leo Desautels
Author(s):  
Shantanu Banik ◽  
Rangaraj M. Rangayyan ◽  
J. E. Leo Desautels

Architectural distortion is a subtle but important early sign of breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to develop methods for the detection of sites of architectural distortion in prior mammograms of interval-cancer cases. Screening mammograms obtained prior to the detection of cancer could contain subtle signs of early stages of breast cancer, in particular architectural distortion. The methods for the detection of architectural distortion are based upon Gabor filters, phase portrait analysis, a novel method for the analysis of the angular spread of power, fractal analysis via Fractal Dimension (FD), structural analysis of texture via Laws’ texture energy measures derived from geometrically transformed regions of interest (ROIs), and statistical analysis of texture using Haralick’s 14 texture features. The application of Gabor filters and linear phase portrait modeling was used to detect initial candidates of sites of architectural distortion; 4,224 ROIs, including 301 true-positive ROIs related to architectural distortion, were automatically obtained from 106 prior mammograms of 56 interval-cancer cases and from 52 mammograms of 13 normal cases. For each ROI, the FD, three measures of angular spread of power, 10 Laws’ measures, and 14 Haralick’s features were computed. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves obtained using the features selected by stepwise logistic regression and the leave-one-ROI-out method are 0.76 with the Bayesian classifier, 0.75 with Fisher linear discriminate analysis, and 0.78 with a single-layer feed forward neural network. Free-response receiver operating characteristics indicated sensitivities of 0.80 and 0.90 at 5.8 and 8.1 false positives per image, respectively, with the Bayesian classifier and the leave-one-image-out method. The methods have shown good potential in detecting architectural distortion in mammograms of interval-cancer cases.


2003 ◽  
Vol 181 (4) ◽  
pp. 1083-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay A. Baker ◽  
Eric L. Rosen ◽  
Joseph Y. Lo ◽  
Edgardo I. Gimenez ◽  
Ruth Walsh ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Wei ◽  
Berkman Sahiner ◽  
Heang-Ping Chan ◽  
Lubomir M. Hadjiiski ◽  
Marilyn A. Roubidoux ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 033010-1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayasree Chakraborty ◽  
Rangaraj M. Rangayyan ◽  
Shantanu Banik ◽  
Sudipta Mukhopadhyay ◽  
J. E. Leo Desautels

2010 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabel M. Scaranelo ◽  
Pavel Crystal ◽  
Karina Bukhanov ◽  
Thomas H. Helbich

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of a direct computer-aided detection (CAD) system (d-CAD) in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for the detection of microcalcifications not associated with mass or architectural distortion. Materials and Methods A database search of 1063 consecutive stereotactic core biopsies performed between 2002 and 2005 identified 196 patients with Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 and 5 microcalcifications not associated with mass or distortion detected exclusively by bilateral FFDM. A commercially available CAD system (Second Look, version 7.2) was retrospectively applied to the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views in these patients (mean age, 59 years; range, 35–84 years). Breast density, location and mammographic size of the lesion, distribution, and tumour histology were recorded and analysed by using χ2, Fisher exact, or McNemar tests, when applicable. Results When using d-CAD, 71 of 74 malignant microcalcification cases (96%) and 101 of 122 benign microcalcifications (83%) were identified. There was a significant difference ( P < .05) between CAD sensitivity on the craniocaudal view, 91% (68 of 75), vs CAD sensitivity on the mediolateral oblique view, 80% (60 of 75). The d-CAD sensitivity for dense breast tissue (American College of Radiology [ACR] density 3 and 4) was higher (97%) than d-CAD sensitivity (95%) for nondense tissue (ACR density 1 and 2), but the difference was not statically significant. All 28 malignant calcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by CAD, whereas the sensitivity for lesions small than or equal to 10 mm was 94%. Conclusions D-CAD had a high sensitivity in the depiction of asymptomatic breast cancers, which were seen as microcalcifications on FFDM screening, with a sensitivity of d-CAD on the craniocaudal view being significantly better. All malignant microcalcifications larger than 10 mm were detected by d-CAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document