Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets

1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario J. Miranda ◽  
Joseph W. Glauber
2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoguang Feng ◽  
Dermot Hayes

Purpose Portfolio risk in crop insurance due to the systemic nature of crop yield losses has inhibited the development of private crop insurance markets. Government subsidy or reinsurance has therefore been used to support crop insurance programs. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the possibility of converting systemic crop yield risk into “poolable” risk. Specifically, this study examines whether it is possible to remove the co-movement as well as tail dependence of crop yield variables by enlarging the risk pool across different crops and countries. Design/methodology/approach Hierarchical Kendall copula (HKC) models are used to model potential non-linear correlations of the high-dimensional crop yield variables. A Bayesian estimation approach is applied to account for estimation risk in the copula parameters. A synthetic insurance portfolio is used to evaluate the systemic risk and diversification effect. Findings The results indicate that the systemic nature – both positive correlation and lower tail dependence – of crop yield risks can be eliminated by combining crop insurance policies across crops and countries. Originality/value The study applies the HKC in the context of agricultural risks. Compared to other advanced copulas, the HKC achieves both flexibility and parsimony. The flexibility of the HKC makes it appropriate to precisely represent various correlation structures of crop yield risks while the parsimony makes it computationally efficient in modeling high-dimensional correlation structure.


2001 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiva S. Makki ◽  
Agapi Somwaru

2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith H. Coble ◽  
Barry J. Barnett

Moving from price-triggered to area revenue–triggered programs was perhaps the most common theme among 2007 farm bill proposals. Area revenue–triggered commodity programs may make farm-level revenue insurance products seem redundant, raising questions about why the federal government should continue both programs. Area revenue–triggered programs would remove much of the systemic risk faced by producers. As a result, private sector insurers may be able to insure the residual risk without federal involvement. This paper examines the effects of moving to area revenue–triggered commodity programs with a focus on public policy issues that would likely arise.


2016 ◽  
Vol 99 (3) ◽  
pp. 732-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Du ◽  
Hongli Feng ◽  
David A. Hennessy

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiwei Shen ◽  
Martin Odening
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document