History of Controlled Environment Horticulture: Indoor Farming and Its Key Technologies

The most recent platform for protected horticultural crop production, with the shortest history to date, is located entirely indoors, lacking even the benefit of free, natural sunlight. Although this may not sound offhand like a good idea for commercial specialty-crop production, the concept of indoor controlled-environment plant growth started originally for the benefit of researchers—to systematically investigate effects of specific environmental factors on plant growth and development in isolation from environmental factors varying in uncontrolled ways that would confound or change experimental findings. In addition to its value for basic and applied research, it soon was discovered that providing nonlimiting plant-growth environments greatly enhanced crop yield and enabled manipulation of plant development in ways that were never previously possible. As supporting technology for indoor crop production has improved in capability and efficiency, energy requirements have declined substantially for growing crops through entire production cycles in completely controlled environments, and this combination has spawned a new sector of the controlled-environment crop-production industry. This article chronicles the evolution of events, enabling technologies, and entrepreneurial efforts that have brought local, year-round indoor crop production to the forefront of public visibility and the threshold of profitability for a growing number of specialty crops in locations with seasonal climates.

Observed Changes in Agroclimate Metrics Relevant for Specialty Crop Production in California

Every decade, a suite of standardized climatological metrics known as climate normals are updated, providing averages of temperature and precipitation data over the previous 30-year period. Although some of these climate normals are directly applicable to agricultural producers, there are additional agroclimate metrics calculated from meteorological data that provide physiologically relevant information for on-farm management decisions. In this study, we identified a suite of energy-based agroclimate metrics and calculated changes over the two most recent normal periods (1981–2010 and 1991–2020), focusing on specialty crop production regions in California. Observed changes in agroclimate metrics were largely consistent with broader global warming trends. While most metrics showed small changes between the two periods, during the 1991–2020 period, the last spring freeze occurred ~5 days earlier as compared to the 1981-2010 period, contributing to a >6 day longer frost-free period in the Sacramento and Salinas Valleys; likewise an additional 6.4 tropical nights (Tn > 20 °C) occurred in the Coachella Valley during the 1991-2020 period. A complementary trend analysis of the agroclimate metrics over the 1981–2020 period showed significant increases in growing degree days across all agricultural regions, while significant increases in heat exposure were found for the Salinas and Imperial Valleys and over the Central Coast region. Moreover, summer reference evapotranspiration increased approximately 40 mm in California’s Central Valley during 1981–2020, with implications for agricultural water resources. Quantifying the shifts in these agroclimate metrics between the two most recent 30-year normal periods and the accompanying 40-year trends provides context for understanding and communicating around changing climatic baselines and underscores the need for adaptation to meet the challenge that climate change poses to agriculture both in the future and in the present.

Impacts of winter cover cropping on soil moisture and evapotranspiration in California's specialty crop fields may be minimal during winter months

As fresh water supplies become more unreliable, variable and expensive, the water-related implications of sustainable agriculture practices such as cover cropping are drawing increasing attention from California's agricultural communities. However, the adoption of winter cover cropping remains limited among specialty crop growers who face uncertainty regarding the water use of this practice. To investigate how winter cover crops affect soil water and evapotranspiration on farm fields, we studied three systems that span climatic and farming conditions in California's Central Valley: processing tomato fields with cover crop, almond orchards with cover crop, and almond orchards with native vegetation. From 2016 to 2019, we collected soil moisture data (3 years of neutron hydroprobe and gravimetric tests at 10 field sites) and evapotranspiration measurements (2 years at two of 10 sites) in winter cover cropped and control (clean-cultivated, bare ground) plots during winter months. Generally, there were not significant differences in soil moisture between cover cropped and control fields throughout or at the end of the winter seasons, while evapo-transpirative losses due to winter cover crops were negligible relative to clean-cultivated soil. Our results suggest that winter cover crops in the Central Valley may break even in terms of actual consumptive water use. California growers of high-value specialty crops can likely adopt winter cover cropping without altering their irrigation plans and management practices.

Impacts of winter cover cropping on soil moisture and evapotranspiration in California's specialty crop fields may be minimal during winter months

As fresh water supplies become more unreliable, variable and expensive, the water-related implications of sustainable agriculture practices such as cover cropping are drawing increasing attention from California's agricultural communities. However, the adoption of winter cover cropping remains limited among specialty crop growers who face uncertainty regarding the water use of this practice. To investigate how winter cover crops affect soil water and evapotranspiration on farm fields, we studied three systems that span climatic and farming conditions in California's Central Valley: processing tomato fields with cover crop, almond orchards with cover crop, and almond orchards with native vegetation. From 2016 to 2019, we collected soil moisture data (3 years of neutron hydroprobe and gravimetric tests at 10 field sites) and evapotranspiration measurements (2 years at two of 10 sites) in winter cover cropped and control (clean-cultivated, bare ground) plots during winter months. Generally, there were not significant differences in soil moisture between cover cropped and control fields throughout or at the end of the winter seasons, while evapo-transpirative losses due to winter cover crops were negligible relative to clean-cultivated soil. Our results suggest that winter cover crops in the Central Valley may break even in terms of actual consumptive water use. California growers of high-value specialty crops can likely adopt winter cover cropping without altering their irrigation plans and management practices.

First Report of Meloidogyne javanica on Globe Artichoke in Florida, USA

Globe artichoke (Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus L.) is native to the Mediterranean region and cultivated worldwide for its edible flower buds and the medicinal value of its leaves (Pignone and Sonnante 2004). In 2019, artichokes were planted on 29 km2 predominantly in California, with a yield of over 100 million kg (USDA 2020). It has been grown as a specialty crop in Florida since 2017 (Agehara 2017a). Meloidogyne spp. (root-knot nematodes/RKNs) can lead to yield losses to artichoke (Greco et al. 2005). In June 2020, artichokes (cv. Imperial Star) with stunting, wilting, and galled-root symptoms were observed in a research field with sandy soil located at the University of Florida Gulf Coast Research and Education Center (UF/GCREC), Wimauma, Florida. The goal of this report was to identify the RKN species collected from two symptomatic artichoke roots. Morphological measurements (mean, standard deviation and range) of 15 second-stage juveniles (J2s) included body length = 409.1 ± 31.6 (360.3 - 471.3) µm, body width = 15.4 ± 1.6 (12.4 - 18.8) µm, and stylet length = 14.7 ± 0.7 (13.9 -16.1) µm. Perineal patterns of five matured females had a high dorsal arch and double lateral lines. Morphological characteristics of the RKN cultures were consistent with the description of M. javanica (Eisenback and Triantaphyllou 1991). DNA was extracted respectively from two RKN females isolated from the diseased artichoke roots. The nematode species was confirmed with primers Fjav/Rjav and resulted in ≈ 670 bp fragment (Zijlstra et al. 2000). The COXII region of mtDNA was amplified by C2F3/1108 (Powers and Harris 1993), and the sequencing results were submitted to the NCBI with GeneBank Accession No. MZ397905. The molecular sequences had 100% identity with M. javanica in COXII (MK033440 and MK033439). The pathogenicity test was conducted in the greenhouse at UF/GCREC from May to August 2021 (temperature = 26.7 ± 4.1°C, relative humidity = 83.9 ± 14.6 %). Each of the ten 6.5-in-diameter plastic pots containing 3.8-L pasteurized soil was seeded with one artichoke seed. Five pots were inoculated with 5000 eggs of the field RKN cultures 4-week after planting, and five pots served as the untreated control. Two months after inoculation, galled symptoms were only observed in inoculated plants with an average gall index (Bridge and Page 1980) of 6.2 ± 2.2; 99,240 ± 72,250 eggs were extracted from each root system, and the nematode reproduction factor was 19.9 ± 14.4. Meloidogyne spp. has been reported on artichoke in Europe, Asia, and South America (Greco et al. 2005). This is the first report of RKN on artichoke in the United States. Meloidogyne javanica caused severe root gall symptoms and visible aboveground damage in the form of chlorosis, stunting, and wilting of artichoke planted at the UF/GCREC research farm. Meloidogyne javanica is the predominant RKN species at the UF/GCREC research farm and one of the most common RKNs in Florida (Gu and Desaeger 2021). Artichoke is a new crop in Florida, and RKNs is likely to be one of the main soilborne problems for its production in the state. Its long growing season (October - May) (Agehara 2017b) allows for high nematode reproduction rates. Several new growers have already reported RKN as a problem in their fields. For artichoke to become a commodity in Florida, managing RKNs will be critical. This report provides new information on the risk that RKNs pose to artichoke, a newly established specialty crop in Florida.

IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation

Pest management practices in modern industrial agriculture have increasingly relied on insurance-based insecticides such as seed treatments that are poorly correlated with pest density or crop damage. This approach, combined with high invertebrate toxicity for newer products like neonicotinoids, makes it challenging to conserve beneficial insects and the services that they provide. We used a 4-y experiment using commercial-scale fields replicated across multiple sites in the midwestern United States to evaluate the consequences of adopting integrated pest management (IPM) using pest thresholds compared with standard conventional management (CM). To do so, we employed a systems approach that integrated coproduction of a regionally dominant row crop (corn) with a pollinator-dependent specialty crop (watermelon). Pest populations, pollination rates, crop yields, and system profitability were measured. Despite higher pest densities and/or damage in both crops, IPM-managed pests rarely reached economic thresholds, resulting in 95% lower insecticide use (97 versus 4 treatments in CM and IPM, respectively, across all sites, crops, and years). In IPM corn, the absence of a neonicotinoid seed treatment had no impact on yields, whereas IPM watermelon experienced a 129% increase in flower visitation rate by pollinators, resulting in 26% higher yields. The pollinator-enhancement effect under IPM management was mediated entirely by wild bees; foraging by managed honey bees was unaffected by treatments and, overall, did not correlate with crop yield. This proof-of-concept experiment mimicking on-farm practices illustrates that cropping systems in major agricultural commodities can be redesigned via IPM to exploit ecosystem services without compromising, and in some cases increasing, yields.

Determining the utility of an unmanned ground vehicle for weed control in specialty crop systems

Specialty crop herbicides are not a target for herbicide discovery programs and many of these crops do not have access to relevant herbicides. High‐value fruit and vegetable crops represent high potential liability in the case of herbicide‐induced crop damage and low acres for revenue. Labor shortages and higher manual weeding costs are an issue for both conventional and organic specialty crop growers. Robotic weeders are promising new weed control tools for specialty crops, because they are cheaper to develop and, with fewer environmental and human health risks, are less regulated than herbicides. However, many of the robotic weeders are too expensive for small growers to use. In the future greater investment into robotic weeders for small scale growers will be important. The Clearpath robotics platform Husky may provide a cheap and autonomous way to control weeds in small diversified specialty crop farms. Being able to work autonomously in multiple soil moisture environments is the driving factor behind optimizing the Husky platform for weed control. Research has been conducted to evaluate the impact of soil moisture and mechanical actuator on mobility and weed control. Though weed control was not commercially acceptable in these studies, future optimizations to the Husky robotics platform have the potential to achieve commercial success.