Groups of finite Morley rank with transitive group automorphisms

1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 1080-1082
Author(s):  
Ali Nesin

The aim of this short note is to prove the following result:Theorem. Let G be a group of finite Morley rank with Aut G acting transitively on G/{1}. Then G is either abelian or a bad group.Bad groups were first defined by Cherlin [Ch]: these are groups of finite Morley rank without solvable and nonnilpotent connected subgroups. They have been investigated by the author [Ne 1], Borovik [Bo], Corredor [Co], and Poizat and Borovik [Bo-Po]. They are not supposed to exist, but we are far from proving their nonexistence. This is one of the major obstacles to proving Cherlin's conjecture: infinite simple groups of finite Morley rank are algebraic groups.If the group G of the theorem is finite, then it is well known that G ≈ ⊕Zp for some prime p: clearly all elements of G have the same order, say p, a prime. Thus G is a finite p-group, so has a nontrivial center. But Aut G acts transitively; thus G is abelian. Since it has exponent p, G ≈ ⊕Zp.The same proof for infinite G does not work even if it has finite Morley rank, for the following reasons:1) G may not contain an element of finite order.2) Even if G does contain an element of finite order, i.e. if G has exponent p, we do not know if G must have a nontrivial center.

2008 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
OLIVIER FRÉCON

The Cherlin–Zil'ber Conjecture states that all simple groups of finite Morley rank are algebraic. We prove that any minimal counterexample to this conjecture has a unique conjugacy class of Carter subgroups, which are analogous to Cartan subgroups in algebraic groups.


2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 722-730
Author(s):  
Luis-Jaime Corredor

The Alperin-Goldschmidt Fusion Theorem [1, 5], when combined with pushing up [7], was a useful tool in the classification of the finite simple groups. Similar theorems are needed in the study of simple groups of finite Morley rank, in the even type case (that is, when the Sylow 2-subgroups are of bounded exponent, as in algebraic groups over fields of characteristic 2). In that context a body of results relating to fusion of 2-elements and the structure of 2-local subgroups is needed: pushing up, and the classification of groups with strongly or weakly embedded subgroups, or have strongly closed abelian subgroups (c.f, [2]). Two theorems of Alperin-Goldschmidt type are proved here. Both are needed in applications.The following is an exact analog of the Alperin-Goldschmidt Fusion Theorem for groups of finite Morley rank, in the case of 2-elements:Theorem 1.1. Let G be a group of finite Morley rank, and P a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. If A, B ⊆ P are conjugate in G, then there are subgroups Hi ≤ Pand elementsxi ∈ N(Hi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, and an elementy ∈ N(P), such that for all i:1. Hi is a tame intersection of two Sylow 2-subgroups;2. CP(Hi) ≤ Hi;3. N(Hi)/Hiis 2-isolatedand(a) (b) .


2004 ◽  
Vol 276 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Cherlin ◽  
Eric Jaligot

1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-556
Author(s):  
Mark Kelly Davis ◽  
Ali Nesin

We know quite a lot about the general structure of ω-stable solvable centerless groups of finite Morley rank. Abelian groups of finite Morley rank are also well-understood. By comparison, nonabelian nilpotent groups are a mystery except for the following general results:• An ω1-categorical torsion-free nonabelian nilpotent group is an algebraic group over an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 [Z3].• A nilpotent group of finite Morley rank is the central product of a definable subgroup of finite exponent and of a definable divisible subgroup [N3].• A divisible nilpotent group of finite Morley rank is the direct product of its torsion part (which is central) and of a torsion-free subgroup [N3].However, we do not understand nilpotent groups of bounded exponent. It seems that the classification of nilpotent (but nonabelian) p-groups of finite Morley rank is impossible. Even the nilpotent groups of Morley rank 2 contain insurmountable difficulties [C], [T] . At first glance, this may seem to be an obstacle to proving the Cherlin-Zil'ber conjecture (“simple groups of finite Morley rank are algebraic groups”). Our purpose in this article is to show that if such a group is a definable subgroup of a nonnilpotent group, then it is possible to obtain a classification within the boundaries of our present knowledge. In this respect, our article may be considered as a relief to those who are trying to classify simple groups of finite Morley rank.Before explicitly stating our result, we need the following definition.


2007 ◽  
Vol 314 (2) ◽  
pp. 581-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Burdges ◽  
Gregory Cherlin ◽  
Eric Jaligot

2015 ◽  
Vol 208 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-162
Author(s):  
Tuna Altinel ◽  
Jeffrey Burdges ◽  
Olivier Frécon

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jaligot

AbstractWe show how the notion of full Frobenius group of finite Morley rank generalizes that of bad group, and how it seems to be more appropriate when we consider the possible existence (still unknown) of nonalgebraic simple groups of finite Morley rank of a certain type, notably with no involution. We also show how these groups appear as a major obstacle in the analysis of FT-groups, if one tries to extend the Feit-Thompson theorem to groups of finite Morley rank.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document