A simultaneous test in the presence of nested alternative hypotheses

1986 ◽  
Vol 23 (A) ◽  
pp. 187-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzo Hosoya

This paper considers the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) test or its modification dealing with nested models. The algorithm for evaluating the critical values and the error-rates for the canonical tests are provided; a table of critical values of a class of GLR tests is also given. The test proposed in the paper has applications in time-series model selection.

1986 ◽  
Vol 23 (A) ◽  
pp. 187-200
Author(s):  
Yuzo Hosoya

This paper considers the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) test or its modification dealing with nested models. The algorithm for evaluating the critical values and the error-rates for the canonical tests are provided; a table of critical values of a class of GLR tests is also given. The test proposed in the paper has applications in time-series model selection.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Etz ◽  
Julia M. Haaf ◽  
Jeffrey N. Rouder ◽  
Joachim Vandekerckhove

Hypothesis testing is a special form of model selection. Once a pair of competing models is fully defined, their definition immediately leads to a measure of how strongly each model supports the data. The ratio of their support is often called the likelihood ratio or the Bayes factor. Critical in the model-selection endeavor is the specification of the models. In the case of hypothesis testing, it is of the greatest importance that the researcher specify exactly what is meant by a “null” hypothesis as well as the alternative to which it is contrasted, and that these are suitable instantiations of theoretical positions. Here, we provide an overview of different instantiations of null and alternative hypotheses that can be useful in practice, but in all cases the inferential procedure is based on the same underlying method of likelihood comparison. An associated app can be found at https://osf.io/mvp53/ . This article is the work of the authors and is reformatted from the original, which was published under a CC-By Attribution 4.0 International license and is available at https://psyarxiv.com/wmf3r/ .


Technometrics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
Errol Caby ◽  
Allan D. R. McQuarrie ◽  
Chih-Ling Tsai

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Bisgaard ◽  
Murat Kulahci

10.1142/3573 ◽  
1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan D R McQuarrie ◽  
Chih-Ling Tsai

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Hsiang Lin ◽  
C. Mitchell Dayton

Latent class models have been developed for assessment of hierarchic relations in scaling and behavioral analysis. This article investigated the use of three model selection information criteria—Akaike AIC, Schwarz SIC, and Bozdogan CAIC—for non-nested models. In general, SIC and CAIC were superior to AIC for relatively simple models, whereas AIC was superior for more complex models, although accuracy was often quite low for such models. In addition, some effects were detected for error rates in the models.


2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (451) ◽  
pp. 1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elvezio Ronchetti ◽  
Allan D. R. McQuarrie ◽  
Chih-Ling Tsai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document