Do and Keep What Moses Says (Matthew 23:2-7)

1995 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Allan Powell
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

Subverting The Pharisaic Agenda: Jesus, Matthew 23, and The Sanders-Wright Debate

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. SCOTT
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

Matthew 23: 1-12

1979 ◽  
pp. 34-63
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

Zacharias: A Study of Matthew 23:35

1897 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
John Macpherson
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

Ethical Responsibility and Human Wholeness In Matthew 25:31–46

1987 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan O. Via
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Responsibility ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Sheep And Goats ◽  
First Order ◽  
Matthew 23

My purpose in this article will not be to deal with the tradition history behind Matt 25:31–46 or with the actual eschatological identity of the nations, the sheep and the goats, and Jesus' least brothers, although some attention will need to be given to the latter. My primary purpose will rather be to inquire about the nature and quality of the stance or posture or self-understanding that constitutes the responses of the sheep and goats—which responses Matthew is implicitly calling his readers respectively to actualize and to reject. And what is required of human beings has implications for the possibilities and nature of human beings. The first order of business, however, will be to locate the text generically and in the context of Matthew 23–25.

Matthew 23-25: The Extent of Jesus' Fifth Discourse

2009 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 527
Author(s):  
Hood
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

scholarly journals Kajian Apologetis Terhadap Kontroversi Kemanusiaan Dan Ketidakbersalahaan Yesus Kristus

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-219
Author(s):  
Heryson Butar-Butar
Keyword(s):  
Jesus Christ ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Matthew 23 ◽  
Theological Controversy ◽  
The Temple

The context of understanding the humanity and innocence of Jesus gave rise a theological controversy. The reason is, the all-perfect God who became human in Jesus Christ is difficult to maintain because He is a limited figure and is considered to have made mistakes. For example Jesus' ignorance regarding the person who touched His robe (Mark 5:30-32 and Luke 8 :45), Jesus' ignorance of what will happen in the last days (Mark 13:27-32), Jesus' mistake in calling Zechariah son of Berechiah (Matthew 23:35; 2 Chronicles 24:20) and the wrong behavior of Jesus who was angry in the Temple (Matthew 21:12-16; Luke 19:45-46; John 2:15-16). The purpose of this study is to provide a biblical description in an apologetic frame as a form of a refutation of these assumptions. This study uses a qualitative method with an apologetic approach. An understanding of the person of Jesus needs to be seen comprehensively with the context that binds it. The assumptions about Jesus' guilt and ignorance are not substantially based on a comprehensive and credible interpretation.

scholarly journals The Messiah as the Tutor: The Meaning of καθηγητής in Matthew 23:10

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce W. Winter
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23

Exegetical Commentary on Matthew 23

2015 ◽  
pp. 311-330
Keyword(s):  
Matthew 23
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document