Paul de Man: Deconstruction and the Critique of Aesthetic Ideology

1990 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Michael Fischer ◽  
Christopher Norris
Labyrinth ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Jeremy Spencer

The focus of this essay is Paul de Man's provocative antipathy towards the category of the aesthetic in his late writings on philosophical aesthetics. I introduce de Man's critique of what he terms aesthetic ideology – a form of ideological communication – which he considers manifest in the aesthetics of Schiller in particular but also in more scrupulously critical philosophers. I begin the essay with Benjamin's well known observation that twentieth century fascisms aestheticized political practice as part of a defence of existing property relations. I introduce de Man's critique of aesthetic ideology as a way of developing or elaborating on what are relatively sketchy comments on the relationship aesthetics and politics in Benjamin's earlier essay.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-82
Author(s):  
Tom Toremans

In the 1983 Messenger Lectures, Paul de Man set out to formulate a critique of critical philosophy and Romantic literature as dynamically involved in a post-Romantic predicament that centers around the ‘philosophical phantasm’ of ‘the reconciliation of knowledge with phenomenal, aesthetic experience’. While critical attention has mainly focused on the shift in terminology in de Man's later writings towards linguistic materiality and aesthetic ideology, this article argues that this shift simultaneously implies a radicalisation of de Man's theory and practice of rhetorical reading into an epistemological critique of reading in terms of the incompatibility between cognition and perception, and of the material event and its inevitable reinscription into tropological linguistic models. This shift culminates in de Man's claim, in ‘The Resistance to Theory’, that all theory necessarily avoids the reading it advocates and contains a necessarily pragmatic moment that reinscribes it into the ideological aberration it attempts to resist. De Man's turn to Kant and Schiller in his later writings thus not only supplements his earlier rhetorical readings of Wordsworth, but also implies a radical revaluation of the act of reading that decisively repositions it towards ideology.


1990 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
Jane Marie Todd ◽  
Christopher Norris

1989 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 751
Author(s):  
David S. Gross ◽  
Christopher Norris

1991 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Roger Pensom ◽  
Christopher Norris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document