Social Science Research Methodologies and Historic Preservation:

2014 ◽  
pp. 245-263
Author(s):  
Jeremy C. Wells
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre

This article is a slight revision of a keynote lecture presented at the 15th International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry in Illinois in 2019. It argues that to experiment and create the “new” in post qualitative, post humanist, and other “new” forms of inquiry invented for the 21st century, social science researchers may well need to refuse conventional humanist social science research methodologies created for the problems of previous centuries.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107780042093912
Author(s):  
Aaron M. Kuntz ◽  
Elizabeth Adams St.Pierre

This introduction to a special issue of Qualitative Inquiry on “new approaches to inquiry” questions the need for preexisting social science research methodologies for inquiry that aspires to produce the “new,” that which is unrecognizable and incomprehensible in the Cartesian onto-epistemological arrangement that enables those methodologies. Quite a few contemporary scholars encouraged by the lure of the new have found “old” philosophies promising in dislodging that dogmatic image of thought and its concepts that weigh us down. Whatever the “new” is, it will be different every time, so the articles in the special issue cannot be models of new approaches to inquiry that can be copied and repeated but, instead, are bursts of intensities that have not yet been rendered ordinary. New inquiry, then, is always not-yet, to-come, a force of pure difference pushing through what has been normalized and stratified as it comes into existence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document