scholarly journals Profinite Rigidity, Fibering, and the Figure-Eight Knot

What's Next? ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 45-64
Author(s):  
Martin R. Bridson ◽  
Alan W. Reid
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Itoyama ◽  
A. Mironov ◽  
A. Morozov ◽  
And. Morozov
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Stavros Garoufalidis ◽  
Alan W. Reid

We construct infinitely many examples of pairs of isospectral but non-isometric [Formula: see text]-cusped hyperbolic [Formula: see text]-manifolds. These examples have infinite discrete spectrum and the same Eisenstein series. Our constructions are based on an application of Sunada’s method in the cusped setting, and so in addition our pairs are finite covers of the same degree of a 1-cusped hyperbolic 3-orbifold (indeed manifold) and also have the same complex length spectra. Finally we prove that any finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifold isospectral to the figure-eight knot complement is homeomorphic to the figure-eight knot complement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander MEDNYKH ◽  
Alexey RASSKAZOV
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 150 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Baker
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Masakazu Teragaito

In this paper we will study 2-knots in the 4-sphere S4 which are obtained by roll-spinning 1-knots in the 3-sphere S3. The process of spinning was introduced by Artin[2] and generalized to twist-spinning by Fox [7] and Zeeman [20]. In [7] Fox introduced another variation of the spinning process, called roll-spinning. He only showed that the roll-spun figure-eight knot cannot be obtained by twist-spinning the figure-eight knot. Finally Litherland [14] described the general process of deform-spinning, and he gave a precise definition of roll-spinning. We remark that Fox's roll-spinning is not the same as Litherland's: Fox's roll-spun figure-eight knot is the symmetry-spun figure-eight knot in terms of [14].


Author(s):  
Robert Riley

When k is a 2-bridge knot with group πK, there are parabolic representations (p-reps) θ: πK → PSL(): = PSL(2, ). The most obvious problem that this suggests is the determination of a presentation for an image group πKθ. We shall settle the easiest outstanding case in section 2 below, viz. k the figure-eight knot 41, which has the 2-bridge normal form (5, 3). We shall prove that the (two equivalent) p-reps θ for this knot are isomorphisms of πK on πKθ. Furthermore, the universal covering space of S3\k can be realized as Poincaré's upper half space 3, and πKθ is a group of hyperbolic isometries of 3 which is also the deck transformation group of the covering 3 → S3\k. The group πKθ is a subgroup of two closely related groups that we study in section 3. We shall give fundamental domains, presentations, and other information for all these groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document